BODY CORPORATE 160361 v BC 2004 LIMITED AND BC 2009 LIMITED [2015] NZHC 3079

BODY CORPORATE 160361 v BC 2004 LIMITED AND BC 2009 LIMITED [2015] NZHC 3079

Because the plaintiffs provided the schedules as ordered (including an updated Schedule 1), the Court entered judgment for the plaintiffs in accordance with the attached schedules.

Citation
[2015] NZHC 3079
Parties
First Plaintiff: BODY CORPORATE 160361; Second Plaintiff: BODY CORPORATE 160362; Third Plaintiffs: FONG HONG YUEN & OTHERS; First Defendant: BC 2004 LIMITED; First Defendant: BC 2009 LIMITED; First Third Party (in Liquidation): PBS DISTRIBUTORS LIMITED; Second Third Party (discontinued): FAÇADE DESIGN SERVICES LIMITED; Third Third Party (discontinued): RONALD CHARLES HANLEY; Fourth Third Party: JOHN LUKASZEWICZ
Court
High Court
Jurisdiction
New Zealand
Judgment Date
7 December 2015
Procedural Posture
Civil / Final Award / Judgment
Outcome
Judgment for the plaintiffs in accordance with schedules 1, B2, C, D and E attached to the judgment.
Legal Topics
Quantum, Costs, Final Award, Schedules
Civil Procedure Judgment Enforcement Costs Quantum Final Award Schedules

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

BODY CORPORATE 160361

First Plaintiff

BODY CORPORATE 160362

Second Plaintiff

FONG HONG YUEN & OTHERS

Third Plaintiffs

BC 2004 LIMITED

First Defendant

BC 2009 LIMITED

First Defendant

PBS DISTRIBUTORS LIMITED

First Third Party (in Liquidation)

FAÇADE DESIGN SERVICES LIMITED

Second Third Party (discontinued)

RONALD CHARLES HANLEY

Third Third Party (discontinued)

JOHN LUKASZEWICZ

Fourth Third Party

Procedural Posture

Civil / Final Award / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether judgment should be entered for the plaintiffs
  2. 2 Quantum of damages and assessment of costs
  3. 3 Effect of provision of schedules as required by the Court

Ratio Decidendi

Because the plaintiffs provided the schedules as ordered (including an updated Schedule 1), the Court entered judgment for the plaintiffs in accordance with the attached schedules.

Court Disposition

Judgment for the plaintiffs in accordance with schedules 1, B2, C, D and E attached to the judgment.

Orders

  • Judgment entered in favour of the plaintiffs in accordance with schedules 1, B2, C, D and E attached to the judgment.
  • Costs and quantum to be as set out in the attached schedules.