WINDERS v R [2016] NZCA 333

WINDERS v R [2016] NZCA 333

The Court granted leave to appeal but, after consideration, dismissed the substantive appeal; concurrently the Court imposed a temporary publication prohibition to protect the integrity of an associated trial, while allowing publication in law reports or lawdigests.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2016] NZCA 333
Parties
Appellant: Quinton Paul Winders; Respondent: The Queen
Court
Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
New Zealand
Judgment Date
15 July 2016
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal and Substantive Appeal Determination
Outcome
Application for leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed; publication prohibition imposed until final disposition of trial with law report publication permitted.
Legal Topics
Leave to Appeal, Publication Prohibition, Trial Publicity
Criminal Law Appeal Leave to Appeal Publication Prohibition Trial Publicity

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Quinton Paul Winders

Appellant

The Queen

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal and Substantive Appeal Determination

  1. 1 Whether leave to appeal should be granted
  2. 2 Whether the appeal succeeds on its merits
  3. 3 Whether a publication prohibition was necessary until final disposition of trial

Ratio Decidendi

The Court granted leave to appeal but, after consideration, dismissed the substantive appeal; concurrently the Court imposed a temporary publication prohibition to protect the integrity of an associated trial, while allowing publication in law reports or lawdigests.

Court Disposition

Application for leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed; publication prohibition imposed until final disposition of trial with law report publication permitted.

Orders

  • The application for leave to appeal is granted.
  • The appeal is dismissed.