RAYLEE PATRICIA HARLEY V THE REGISTRAR-GENERAL OF LAND HC WN CIV 2009-485-2167

RAYLEE PATRICIA HARLEY V THE REGISTRAR-GENERAL OF LAND HC WN CIV 2009-485-2167

The costs judgment was recalled because the respondent's memorandum on costs may not have been served on the applicant; procedural fairness requires service of the memorandum and an opportunity for the applicant to file a response within prescribed time limits before the Court determines costs.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
openlaw-e59547f4_3430_4c7a_ada3_bc9b22831c25.pdf
Parties
Applicant: Raylee Patricia Harley; Respondent: The Registrar‑General of Land
Court
High Court
Jurisdiction
New Zealand
Judgment Date
28 July 2010
Procedural Posture
Appeal Under Section 217 of the Land Transfer Act 1952 / Post Judgment Costs Stage (recall of Costs Judgment)
Outcome
Costs judgment recalled and remitted for reconsideration subject to service and response timetables
Legal Topics
Land Transfer Act 1952, Section 217 Appeal, Costs Recall, Service of Documents
Property Law Land Registration Civil Procedure Land Transfer Act 1952 Section 217 Appeal Costs Recall Service of Documents

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Raylee Patricia Harley

Applicant

The Registrar‑General of Land

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal Under Section 217 of the Land Transfer Act 1952 / Post Judgment Costs Stage (recall of Costs Judgment)

  1. 1 Whether a costs judgment should be recalled where the respondent's costs memorandum may not have been served on the applicant
  2. 2 What procedural steps and timeframes should be ordered to remedy lack of service and to afford the applicant an opportunity to respond

Ratio Decidendi

The costs judgment was recalled because the respondent's memorandum on costs may not have been served on the applicant; procedural fairness requires service of the memorandum and an opportunity for the applicant to file a response within prescribed time limits before the Court determines costs.

Court Disposition

Costs judgment recalled and remitted for reconsideration subject to service and response timetables

Orders

  • The costs judgment dated 6 May 2010 is recalled.
  • Respondent to serve the applicant's counsel with a copy of its costs memorandum within seven days from the date of the judgment recalling costs.