BIRD v POLICE [2017] NZHC 955
The Court allowed the appeal, quashed the 15 month imprisonment sentence and substituted a seven month home detention sentence to take account of time already served, directed that the appellant's name not be placed on (or be removed from) the Child Sex Offender Register, and ordered that home detention address and...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2017] NZHC 955
- Parties
- Appellant: Raymond Lee Bird; Respondent: New Zealand Police
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 11 May 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence (results Judgment)
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; original sentence of 15 months imprisonment quashed; substituted sentence of seven months home detention; appellant not to be placed on (or to be removed from) the Child Sex Offender Register.
- Legal Topics
- Home Detention, Custodial Sentence, Child Sex Offender Register, Sentence Substitution
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Raymond Lee Bird
Appellant
New Zealand Police
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence (results Judgment)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the 15 month imprisonment sentence was manifestly excessive
- 2 Whether substitution with home detention was appropriate and should account for time already served
- 3 Whether the appellant's name should be placed on or removed from the Child Sex Offender Register
Ratio Decidendi
The Court allowed the appeal, quashed the 15 month imprisonment sentence and substituted a seven month home detention sentence to take account of time already served, directed that the appellant's name not be placed on (or be removed from) the Child Sex Offender Register, and ordered that home detention address and special conditions be as set out in the PAC Report dated 27 January 2017, with the substituted sentence to take effect 12 May 2016.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; original sentence of 15 months imprisonment quashed; substituted sentence of seven months home detention; appellant not to be placed on (or to be removed from) the Child Sex Offender Register.
Orders
- Quash the sentence of 15 months imprisonment
- Substitute a sentence of seven months home detention
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
BIRD v POLICE [2017] NZHC 955 [11 May 2017]IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALANDNEW PLYMOUTH REGISTRYCRI 2017-443-4[2017] NZHC 955BETWEEN RAYMOND LEE BIRDAppellantAND NEW ZEALAND POLICERespondentHearing: 2 May 2017Counsel: K R Pascoe for AppellantJ A Eng for RespondentJudgment: 11 May 2017RESULTS JUDGMENT OF ELLIS J[1] Mr Bird's appeal is allowed. The sentence of 15 months imprisonment isquashed. A sentence of seven months home detention is substituted. That term is intended to take account of the time he has already spent in custody. In addition, Mr Bird's name is not to be placed on (or is to be removed from) the Child SexOffender Register.[2] His home detention address and the special conditions are as set out in the PAC Report dated 27 January 2017. The substituted sentence is to take effect from tomorrow, 12 May 2016.I have released this as a results judgment in light of the fact that Mr Bird is presently incarcerated. My reasons will follow in a separate judgment as soon as possible.___________________________Rebecca Ellis J