PAULINE JANICE HARRISON v AUCKLAND DISTRICT HEALTH BOARD [2013] NZSC 150
The application to recall the Court's judgment was dismissed because the applicants failed to raise any matter sufficient to justify recall of the judgment.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2013] NZSC 150
- Parties
- First Applicant: Pauline Janice Harrison; Second Applicant: Angela Janice Harrison; First Respondent: Auckland District Health Board; Second Respondent: F; Third Respondent: G; Fourth Respondent: H; Fifth Respondent: Health and Disability Commissioner; Sixth Respondent: Coronial Services Unit
- Court
- Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 18 December 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Recall of Supreme Court Judgment / Application Decided (judgment)
- Outcome
- Application for recall dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Recall of Judgment, Suppression Order, Privacy of Respondents, Procedural Finality
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Pauline Janice Harrison
First Applicant
Angela Janice Harrison
Second Applicant
Auckland District Health Board
First Respondent
F
Second Respondent
G
Third Respondent
H
Fourth Respondent
Health and Disability Commissioner
Fifth Respondent
Coronial Services Unit
Sixth Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Recall of Supreme Court Judgment / Application Decided (judgment)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether grounds exist to recall the Supreme Court judgment
- 2 Whether detailed merits challenges to the High Court judgment justify recall
- 3 Whether the application raised any matter sufficient to justify recall
Ratio Decidendi
The application to recall the Court's judgment was dismissed because the applicants failed to raise any matter sufficient to justify recall of the judgment.
Court Disposition
Application for recall dismissed
Orders
- Application for recall dismissed.
- Order prohibiting publication of names, addresses or identifying particulars of second, third and fourth respondents
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
HARRISON v AUCKLAND DISTRICT HEALTH BOARD [2013] NZSC 150 [18 December 2013]ORDER PROHIBITING PUBLICATION OF NAMES, ADDRESSES ORIDENTIFYING PARTICULARS OF SECOND, THIRD AND FOURTHRESPONDENTSIN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW ZEALANDSC 23/2013[2014] NZSC 150BETWEEN PAULINE JANICE HARRISONFirst ApplicantANGELA JANICE HARRISONSecond ApplicantAND AUCKLAND DISTRICT HEALTHBOARDFirst RespondentFSecond RespondentGThird RespondentHFourth RespondentHEALTH AND DISABILITYCOMMISSIONERFifth RespondentCORONIAL SERVICES UNITSixth RespondentCourt: McGrath, William Young and Glazebrook JJCounsel: Applicants (in Person)Judgment: 18 December 2013JUDGMENT OF THE COURTThe application for recall is dismissed.____________________________________________________________________REASONS[1] The applicants apply to recall the judgment in Harrison v Auckland District Health Board.1 They have filed submissions that challenge the merits of the High Court judgment and go into detail about matters relating to the treatment of the late Mr Harrison.[2] The application does not however raise any matter that would justify recall ofthis Court's judgment.[3] The application for recall is accordingly dismissed.Solicitors:McElroys, Auckland for Respondents1 [2013] NZSC 98.