MCGRATH v SIMSON [2015] NZHC 3310
Award 2B costs to plaintiffs for all steps except the interlocutory default judgment application and require payment by the third defendant personally because the litigation was hostile and primarily motivated by the defendant's personal interest, so costs must not be borne by the estate or trust assets and there was no demonstrated inability to pay to justify reduction.
- Citation
- [2015] NZHC 3310
- Parties
- First Plaintiffs: Karen Jane McGrath, John Graeme Gardner, Anna Louise Cook, Suzanne Judi Davies; Second Plaintiff: Karen Jane McGrath as Executor and Trustee of the Estate of Sally Elizabeth Simson; Third Plaintiff: Karen Jane McGrath as Trustee of the R & S Simson Family Trust; First Defendant: Russell James Simson as Executor and Trustee of the Estate of Sally Elizabeth Simson; Second Defendant: Russell James Simson as Trustee of the R & S Simson Family Trust; Third Defendant: Russell James Simson
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 18 December 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Rectification and Enforcement of Settlement Agreement; Costs Application / Costs Determination Following Judgment Rectifying Settlement (judgment Issued 28 October 2015)
- Outcome
- Costs awarded to plaintiffs against the third defendant on a 2B basis
- Legal Topics
- Rectification, Specific Performance, Settlement Agreements, Trustee Liability, Costs Awards
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Karen Jane McGrath, John Graeme Gardner, Anna Louise Cook, Suzanne Judi Davies
First Plaintiffs
Karen Jane McGrath as Executor and Trustee of the Estate of Sally Elizabeth Simson
Second Plaintiff
Karen Jane McGrath as Trustee of the R & S Simson Family Trust
Third Plaintiff
Russell James Simson as Executor and Trustee of the Estate of Sally Elizabeth Simson
First Defendant
Russell James Simson as Trustee of the R & S Simson Family Trust
Second Defendant
Russell James Simson
Third Defendant
Procedural Posture
Rectification and Enforcement of Settlement Agreement; Costs Application / Costs Determination Following Judgment Rectifying Settlement (judgment Issued 28 October 2015)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether plaintiffs entitled to costs following successful rectification and dismissal of defendants' claims
- 2 Appropriate costs category and level (2B)
- 3 Whether costs can be paid from estate or trust assets or must be met personally by defendant
Ratio Decidendi
Award 2B costs to plaintiffs for all steps except the interlocutory default judgment application and require payment by the third defendant personally because the litigation was hostile and primarily motivated by the defendant's personal interest, so costs must not be borne by the estate or trust assets and there was no demonstrated inability to pay to justify reduction.
Court Disposition
Costs awarded to plaintiffs against the third defendant on a 2B basis
Orders
- Costs awarded against the third defendant in favour of the plaintiffs on a 2B basis calculated as set out in the plaintiffs' schedule dated 27 November 2015
- Third defendant is prohibited from seeking payment or reimbursement of any such costs award from the estate of Sally Elizabeth Simson or from the assets of the R & S Simson Family Trust
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment