GENGE v THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS & ANOR [2018] NZHC 1302 [5 June 2018]

GENGE v THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS & ANOR [2018] NZHC 1302 [5 June 2018]

The Chief Executive breached s 48(2) of the Corrections Act 2004 by failing to ensure prompt reconsideration of Mr Genge's security classification following his 13 September 2016 request; however, the reclassification did not amount to punishment and there was no breach of s 25(c) NZBORA, so the appropriate relief is a declaration of the procedural breach and disbursements reserved.

Citation
[2018] NZHC 1302
Parties
Applicant: Richard Genge; First Respondent: The Chief Executive Department of Corrections; Second Respondent: The Attorney-General
Court
High Court
Jurisdiction
New Zealand
Judgment Date
5 June 2018
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Judgment
Outcome
Declaration made that the Chief Executive did not ensure prompt reconsideration under s 48(2) of the Corrections Act 2004 following the applicant's 13 September 2016 letter; disbursements reserved.
Legal Topics
Security Classification, Reconsideration Under S 48(2) Corrections Act 2004, Procedural Propriety, NZBORA S25(c) Presumption of Innocence, Judicial Review Remedies

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Richard Genge

Applicant

The Chief Executive Department of Corrections

First Respondent

The Attorney-General

Second Respondent

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the prisoner was given the prompt reconsideration required by s 48(2) of the Corrections Act 2004
  2. 2 Whether reclassification to high security constituted punishment or breached s 25(c) NZBORA (presumption of innocence)
  3. 3 Whether the points assessment and procedures complied with POM and Regulations

Ratio Decidendi

The Chief Executive breached s 48(2) of the Corrections Act 2004 by failing to ensure prompt reconsideration of Mr Genge's security classification following his 13 September 2016 request; however, the reclassification did not amount to punishment and there was no breach of s 25(c) NZBORA, so the appropriate relief is a declaration of the procedural breach and disbursements reserved.

Court Disposition

Declaration made that the Chief Executive did not ensure prompt reconsideration under s 48(2) of the Corrections Act 2004 following the applicant's 13 September 2016 letter; disbursements reserved.

Orders

  • Declaration that the Chief Executive of the Department of Corrections breached s 48(2) Corrections Act 2004 by failing to ensure prompt reconsideration following the applicant's 13 September 2016 letter
  • Disbursements reserved