GENGE v THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS & ANOR [2018] NZHC 1302 [5 June 2018]
The Chief Executive breached s 48(2) of the Corrections Act 2004 by failing to ensure prompt reconsideration of Mr Genge's security classification following his 13 September 2016 request; however, the reclassification did not amount to punishment and there was no breach of s 25(c) NZBORA, so the appropriate relief is a declaration of the procedural breach and disbursements reserved.
- Citation
- [2018] NZHC 1302
- Parties
- Applicant: Richard Genge; First Respondent: The Chief Executive Department of Corrections; Second Respondent: The Attorney-General
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 5 June 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Judgment
- Outcome
- Declaration made that the Chief Executive did not ensure prompt reconsideration under s 48(2) of the Corrections Act 2004 following the applicant's 13 September 2016 letter; disbursements reserved.
- Legal Topics
- Security Classification, Reconsideration Under S 48(2) Corrections Act 2004, Procedural Propriety, NZBORA S25(c) Presumption of Innocence, Judicial Review Remedies
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Richard Genge
Applicant
The Chief Executive Department of Corrections
First Respondent
The Attorney-General
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the prisoner was given the prompt reconsideration required by s 48(2) of the Corrections Act 2004
- 2 Whether reclassification to high security constituted punishment or breached s 25(c) NZBORA (presumption of innocence)
- 3 Whether the points assessment and procedures complied with POM and Regulations
Ratio Decidendi
The Chief Executive breached s 48(2) of the Corrections Act 2004 by failing to ensure prompt reconsideration of Mr Genge's security classification following his 13 September 2016 request; however, the reclassification did not amount to punishment and there was no breach of s 25(c) NZBORA, so the appropriate relief is a declaration of the procedural breach and disbursements reserved.
Court Disposition
Declaration made that the Chief Executive did not ensure prompt reconsideration under s 48(2) of the Corrections Act 2004 following the applicant's 13 September 2016 letter; disbursements reserved.
Orders
- Declaration that the Chief Executive of the Department of Corrections breached s 48(2) Corrections Act 2004 by failing to ensure prompt reconsideration following the applicant's 13 September 2016 letter
- Disbursements reserved
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment