R V SCHOFIELD HC AK CIV 2006-090-10370
The court fixed a starting point for the lead sexual violation offences consistent with authorities (rarely less than eight years after contested trial) and imposed a two year uplift to reflect separate, serious blackmail and particularly serious criminal harassment, resulting in an effective concurrent sentence of 10 years' imprisonment.
- Citation
- openlaw-bc005f35_e98b_42b6_b09e_743243843155.pdf
- Parties
- Prosecutor: The Queen; Defendant: Robert Nigel Schofield
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 28 November 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Sentencing / Sentencing Hearing
- Outcome
- Defendant sentenced to an effective term of 10 years imprisonment; sentences for all offences to be served concurrently.
- Legal Topics
- Rape, Sexual Violation, Unlawful Sexual Connection, Blackmail, Criminal Harassment, Totality Principle, Sentencing Uplift
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Queen
Prosecutor
Robert Nigel Schofield
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sentencing / Sentencing Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 appropriate starting point for rape after contested trial
- 2 whether aggravating factors exist beyond elements of the offences
- 3 quantification of uplift for additional offending (blackmail and harassment)
Ratio Decidendi
The court fixed a starting point for the lead sexual violation offences consistent with authorities (rarely less than eight years after contested trial) and imposed a two year uplift to reflect separate, serious blackmail and particularly serious criminal harassment, resulting in an effective concurrent sentence of 10 years' imprisonment.
Court Disposition
Defendant sentenced to an effective term of 10 years imprisonment; sentences for all offences to be served concurrently.
Orders
- Sexual violation by rape: 10 years imprisonment
- Sexual violation by unlawful sexual connection: 10 years imprisonment
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment