R KEITH V REGENCY HOUSE LTD (AS TRUSTEE OF THE CLARKE SCRIVENER TRUST) AND ANOR HC HAM CIV 2008-419-001212

R KEITH V REGENCY HOUSE LTD (AS TRUSTEE OF THE CLARKE SCRIVENER TRUST) AND ANOR HC HAM CIV 2008-419-001212

Summary judgment was refused because there are significant, non-trivial factual disputes about the nature and extent of the plaintiff's dealings with purchasers (whether he acted in substance as a real estate agent), and because it would be inappropriate to exercise the broad s 7 discretion to validate the contract on summary judgment without full evidence and consideration of public interest.

Citation
openlaw-78035b32_6ce3_4d08_b2f9_5d6a6b783ab3.pdf
Parties
Plaintiff: Ross Keith; First Defendant: Regency House Limited (as trustee of the Clarke Scrivener Trust); Second Defendant: Austen Cyril Clarke
Court
High Court
Jurisdiction
New Zealand
Judgment Date
2 April 2009
Procedural Posture
Civil Contract and Statutory (real Estate Agents Act; Illegal Contracts Act) / Summary Judgment Application (dismissed); Directed to Trial
Outcome
Summary judgment dismissed; proceedings directed to trial and detailed interlocutory directions made
Legal Topics
Summary Judgment, Real Estate Agent Licensing, S62 Real Estate Agents Act Prohibition, Validation Under S7 Illegal Contracts Act, Evidence and Factual Disputes
Contract Real Estate Law Statutory Remedies (illegal Contracts Act 1970) Civil Procedure Summary Judgment Real Estate Agent Licensing S62 Real Estate Agents Act Prohibition Validation Under S7 Illegal Contracts Act +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 14 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ross Keith

Plaintiff

Regency House Limited (as trustee of the Clarke Scrivener Trust)

First Defendant

Austen Cyril Clarke

Second Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Contract and Statutory (real Estate Agents Act; Illegal Contracts Act) / Summary Judgment Application (dismissed); Directed to Trial

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff acted in substance as a real estate agent within s 3(1) of the Real Estate Agents Act 1976
  2. 2 Whether s 62 of the Real Estate Agents Act 1976 bars recovery by an unlicensed agent
  3. 3 Whether the Court should grant validation/relief under s 7 of the Illegal Contracts Act 1970

Ratio Decidendi

Summary judgment was refused because there are significant, non-trivial factual disputes about the nature and extent of the plaintiff's dealings with purchasers (whether he acted in substance as a real estate agent), and because it would be inappropriate to exercise the broad s 7 discretion to validate the contract on summary judgment without full evidence and consideration of public interest.

Court Disposition

Summary judgment dismissed; proceedings directed to trial and detailed interlocutory directions made

Orders

  • Defendants to file statements of defence within 10 working days of judgment
  • All parties to file and serve affidavits listing documents in their control relating to the proceedings within a further 10 working days