RUIREN XU AND DIAMANTINA TRUST LIMITED v IAG NEW ZEALAND LIMITED [2018] NZSC 68

RUIREN XU AND DIAMANTINA TRUST LIMITED v IAG NEW ZEALAND LIMITED [2018] NZSC 68

Leave to appeal was granted so the Supreme Court can determine whether the Court of Appeal was correct to dismiss the applicants' appeal against Nation J.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] NZSC 68
Parties
Applicant: Ruiren Xu; Applicant: Diamantina Trust Limited; Respondent: IAG New Zealand Limited
Court
Supreme Court
Jurisdiction
New Zealand
Judgment Date
2 August 2018
Procedural Posture
Appeal to Supreme Court / Leave to Appeal Granted; Appeal to Proceed on Approved Question
Outcome
Leave to appeal granted; approved question set.
Legal Topics
Leave to Appeal, Appealability, Approval of Question
Civil Procedure Appeal Leave to Appeal Appealability Approval of Question

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ruiren Xu

Applicant

Diamantina Trust Limited

Applicant

IAG New Zealand Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal to Supreme Court / Leave to Appeal Granted; Appeal to Proceed on Approved Question

  1. 1 Whether the Court of Appeal was correct to dismiss the applicants' appeal against the judgment of Nation J
  2. 2 Whether leave to appeal should be granted

Ratio Decidendi

Leave to appeal was granted so the Supreme Court can determine whether the Court of Appeal was correct to dismiss the applicants' appeal against Nation J.

Court Disposition

Leave to appeal granted; approved question set.

Orders

  • Leave to appeal granted; approved question: whether the Court of Appeal was correct to dismiss the applicants' appeal against the judgment of Nation J.