SMITH v BALL [2017] NZHC 3231
Leave to file a notice of opposition and statement of defence was granted because the delay was short, a satisfactory explanation was provided, and the plaintiff would not suffer prejudice, so the interests of justice required granting leave and adjourning the summary judgment application.
- Citation
- [2017] NZHC 3231
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Sahra Ling Smith; First Defendant: Roger Neville Ball; Second Defendant: Crystal Mint Development Limited; Third Defendant: Crystal Mint Limited
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 19 December 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Summary Judgment (estate Administration) / Application for Summary Judgment; Interlocutory Application for Leave to File Opposition Granted and Substantive Hearing Adjourned
- Outcome
- Leave granted to the defendants to file a notice of opposition, affidavits in opposition and a statement of defence; summary judgment application adjourned; costs reserved.
- Legal Topics
- Summary Judgment, Leave to File Defence, Executor Duties, Transfer of Shares, Return of Estate Documents, Scope of Relief
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sahra Ling Smith
Plaintiff
Roger Neville Ball
First Defendant
Crystal Mint Development Limited
Second Defendant
Crystal Mint Limited
Third Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Summary Judgment (estate Administration) / Application for Summary Judgment; Interlocutory Application for Leave to File Opposition Granted and Substantive Hearing Adjourned
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendants should be granted leave to file a notice of opposition and statement of defence out of time under the High Court Rules
- 2 Whether summary judgment should be entered requiring transfer of shares and return of estate documents
- 3 Ambit and scope of the order sought for return of estate documents
Ratio Decidendi
Leave to file a notice of opposition and statement of defence was granted because the delay was short, a satisfactory explanation was provided, and the plaintiff would not suffer prejudice, so the interests of justice required granting leave and adjourning the summary judgment application.
Court Disposition
Leave granted to the defendants to file a notice of opposition, affidavits in opposition and a statement of defence; summary judgment application adjourned; costs reserved.
Orders
- Leave granted to the defendants to file a notice of opposition and affidavits in opposition and a statement of defence
- The summary judgment application is adjourned to 9.00 am on 13 February 2018
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment