GIBSON v R [2015] NZCA 511
Leave to appeal was dismissed because the applicant failed to demonstrate arguable grounds or a real prospect of success sufficient to grant leave.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2015] NZCA 511
- Parties
- Applicant: Scott Michael Gibson; Respondent: The Queen
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 2 November 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Application for Leave to Appeal (on the Papers)
- Outcome
- Application for leave to appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Leave to Appeal, Procedural Law
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Scott Michael Gibson
Applicant
The Queen
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Application for Leave to Appeal (on the Papers)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether to grant leave to appeal
- 2 Whether applicant demonstrated an arguable ground of appeal or real prospect of success
Ratio Decidendi
Leave to appeal was dismissed because the applicant failed to demonstrate arguable grounds or a real prospect of success sufficient to grant leave.
Court Disposition
Application for leave to appeal dismissed
Orders
- Application for leave to appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
GIBSON v R [2015] NZCA 511 [2 November 2015]IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALANDCA615/2015[2015] NZCA 511BETWEEN SCOTT MICHAEL GIBSONApplicantAND THE QUEENRespondentCourt: Ellen France P, French and Winkelmann JJCounsel: A J D Bamford for ApplicantK S Grau for RespondentJudgment:(On the papers)2 November 2015 at 4.30 pmJUDGMENT OF THE COURTThe application for leave to appeal is dismissed.____________________________________________________________________[Reasons to follow]Solicitors:Bamford Law, Nelson for ApplicantCrown Law Office, Wellington for Respondent