JAG MEDIA LTD V MAGNA SYSTEMS ENGINEERING (NZ) LTD HC AK CIV-2012-404-1965
The plaintiffs' application to release the expert and solicitor reports to the proposed third parties was dismissed because there were no special circumstances to permit collateral use of material obtained under the search order; however, the court ordered by consent a defined process for management of the seized data whereby the search expert (Mr Spence) provides copies of all obtained data and process information to the first defendant (Magna), with a mechanism for Magna to identify material it contends should be returned or claimed privileged and with forensic images retained securely and not disclosed pending further order
- Citation
- openlaw-8f259ecd_b584_4f02_b2f5_e38937b72445.pdf
- Parties
- First Plaintiff: JAG MEDIA LIMITED; Second Plaintiff: BROADCAST INC LIMITED; First Defendant: MAGNA SYSTEMS ENGINEERING (NZ) LIMITED; Second Defendant: COUNTRY 99 TV
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 9 July 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Interlocutory — Applications Arising From Execution of Search Order (disclosure, Directions, Privilege)
- Outcome
- Plaintiffs' application to release reports dismissed except as to parties who did not object (Eyeworks and Broadcast Traffic Systems and their lawyers); court made consent orders governing provision of data to Magna and handling of forensic material; costs awarded to defendants on a 2B basis for the opposed...
- Legal Topics
- Search Orders, Use of Seized Evidence, Disclosure to Third Parties, Privilege, Forensic Imaging, Costs
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
JAG MEDIA LIMITED
First Plaintiff
BROADCAST INC LIMITED
Second Plaintiff
MAGNA SYSTEMS ENGINEERING (NZ) LIMITED
First Defendant
COUNTRY 99 TV
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interlocutory — Applications Arising From Execution of Search Order (disclosure, Directions, Privilege)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether reports and seized material obtained under a search order may be released to third parties including parties to a related debt proceeding and a liquidator
- 2 Scope and permissible use of information obtained under a search order and rule against collateral use
- 3 Procedure for identifying and handling privileged or confidential data from forensic images
Ratio Decidendi
The plaintiffs' application to release the expert and solicitor reports to the proposed third parties was dismissed because there were no special circumstances to permit collateral use of material obtained under the search order; however, the court ordered by consent a defined process for management of the seized data whereby the search expert (Mr Spence) provides copies of all obtained data and process information to the first defendant (Magna), with a mechanism for Magna to identify material it contends should be returned or claimed privileged and with forensic images retained securely and not disclosed pending further order
Court Disposition
Plaintiffs' application to release reports dismissed except as to parties who did not object (Eyeworks and Broadcast Traffic Systems and their lawyers); court made consent orders governing provision of data to Magna and handling of forensic material; costs awarded to defendants on a 2B basis for the opposed...
Orders
- Plaintiffs' application for leave to release the Spence report and independent solicitor's report dismissed except insofar as consent was given to release to Eyeworks and Broadcast Traffic Systems Ltd and their lawyers
- Mr Spence to provide the first defendant, Magna Systems Engineering (NZ) Ltd, with copies of all data obtained during execution of the search order
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment