BODY CORPORATE NO. 209549 AND ANOR V AKITA CONSTRUCTION LIMITED AND ORS HC AK CIV-2005-404-3080
Given lack of financial particulars from Blue Sky and potential inability or unwillingness to meet adverse costs, the Court exercised its discretion to order security for costs of $70,000 per defendant (or per paired defendants where applicable), payable in two tranches, in the interests of fairness and proportionality; stays were declined at this stage but leave granted to apply on short notice in event of default; costs of the applications awarded to defendant applicants on a 2B basis.
- Citation
- openlaw-6c477687_4fc0_4edf_9b34_6a5fb6c7de5a.pdf
- Parties
- First Plaintiff: Body Corporate No. 209549; Second Plaintiffs: Sealite Investments Limited; Second Plaintiff (one Of): Blue Sky Holdings Limited; First Defendant: Akita Construction Limited; Second Defendant: Cornerstone Group Limited; Third Defendant: George Clarke; Fourth Defendant: Compass Building Certification Limited; Fifth Defendant: Plaster Systems Limited; Sixth Defendant: Nu-Way Plasterers Limited; Seventh Defendant: Raymark Waterproofing Limited; Eighth Defendant: MSC Consulting Limited; Ninth Defendant: QBE Insurance (International) Limited; Tenth Defendant: Cornerstone Oyster Cove Limited
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 18 July 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (leaky Building Claims) / Pre Trial Applications for Security for Costs
- Outcome
- Ordered Blue Sky (one of the second plaintiffs) to provide security for costs; awarded costs of the security applications to defendant applicants on a 2B basis; refused immediate stay but granted leave to apply for stay on three days notice in event of default; reserved procedural rights to apply for additional orders.
- Legal Topics
- Security for Costs, Costs Orders, Stay for Non Compliance, Unit Titles, Party and Party Costs
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Body Corporate No. 209549
First Plaintiff
Sealite Investments Limited
Second Plaintiffs
Blue Sky Holdings Limited
Second Plaintiff (one Of)
Akita Construction Limited
First Defendant
Cornerstone Group Limited
Second Defendant
George Clarke
Third Defendant
Compass Building Certification Limited
Fourth Defendant
Plaster Systems Limited
Fifth Defendant
Nu-Way Plasterers Limited
Sixth Defendant
Raymark Waterproofing Limited
Seventh Defendant
MSC Consulting Limited
Eighth Defendant
QBE Insurance (International) Limited
Ninth Defendant
Cornerstone Oyster Cove Limited
Tenth Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil (leaky Building Claims) / Pre Trial Applications for Security for Costs
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether security for costs should be ordered against Blue Sky Holdings Limited
- 2 Appropriate amount of security for costs
- 3 Form and timetable for provision of security
Ratio Decidendi
Given lack of financial particulars from Blue Sky and potential inability or unwillingness to meet adverse costs, the Court exercised its discretion to order security for costs of $70,000 per defendant (or per paired defendants where applicable), payable in two tranches, in the interests of fairness and proportionality; stays were declined at this stage but leave granted to apply on short notice in event of default; costs of the applications awarded to defendant applicants on a 2B basis.
Court Disposition
Ordered Blue Sky (one of the second plaintiffs) to provide security for costs; awarded costs of the security applications to defendant applicants on a 2B basis; refused immediate stay but granted leave to apply for stay on three days notice in event of default; reserved procedural rights to apply for additional orders.
Orders
- Blue Sky to provide security for costs of $70,000 for each defendant (or pair of defendants in the cases of the second and tenth and the fourth and ninth defendants)
- Security to be provided in two tranches of $35,000 each: first tranche within 14 days and second tranche no later than 90 days before trial
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment