HIGHGATE ON BROADWAY LIMITED v DEVINE HC BLE CIV 2012-406-136
The landlord's 24 April 2012 letter to the arbitrator constituted credible evidence from which it was reasonable to infer the landlord would be unable to pay an adverse costs award; balancing the discretionary factors (including the landlord's conduct, third party funding and that security would not prevent...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- openlaw-1a1af6f2_a0a3_4fce_9b91_34662cb96d2e.pdf
- Parties
- Applicant (landlord): HIGHGATE ON BROADWAY LIMITED; Respondent (tenant): ARTHUR LAWRENCE MICHAEL DEVINE
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 10 September 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Security for Costs Application in High Court Arising From Challenge to Arbitral Jurisdiction and Related Proceedings Under the Arbitration Act 1996 / Interlocutory (hearing of Application for Security for Costs)
- Outcome
- Order for security for costs granted in the sum of $11,250, payable into Court by 4.00 pm on 14 September 2012; $5,000 in landlord's solicitor's trust account may be applied to that payment; undertaking discharged to that extent; tenant awarded costs on category 2 band B plus disbursements fixed by the Registrar.
- Legal Topics
- Security for Costs, Impecuniosity, Jurisdiction Challenge, Relief Against Forfeiture, Unlawful Eviction
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
HIGHGATE ON BROADWAY LIMITED
Applicant (landlord)
ARTHUR LAWRENCE MICHAEL DEVINE
Respondent (tenant)
Procedural Posture
Security for Costs Application in High Court Arising From Challenge to Arbitral Jurisdiction and Related Proceedings Under the Arbitration Act 1996 / Interlocutory (hearing of Application for Security for Costs)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether there is credible evidence the applicant will be unable to meet an adverse costs award
- 2 Whether it is appropriate in the exercise of the Court's discretion to order security for costs
- 3 Quantum of appropriate security
Ratio Decidendi
The landlord's 24 April 2012 letter to the arbitrator constituted credible evidence from which it was reasonable to infer the landlord would be unable to pay an adverse costs award; balancing the discretionary factors (including the landlord's conduct, third party funding and that security would not prevent prosecution of the claim) the Court ordered security for costs of $11,250 payable to Court by 4.00 pm 14 September 2012, permitting application of $5,000 in the solicitor's trust account.
Court Disposition
Order for security for costs granted in the sum of $11,250, payable into Court by 4.00 pm on 14 September 2012; $5,000 in landlord's solicitor's trust account may be applied to that payment; undertaking discharged to that extent; tenant awarded costs on category 2 band B plus disbursements fixed by the Registrar.
Orders
- Pay $11,250 into the Court by 4.00 pm on Friday 14 September 2012
- The $5,000 sum in the landlord's solicitor's trust account may be used for that purpose and the undertaking given by the landlord's counsel is discharged to that extent
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment