MA v TAY & ORS [2013] NZHC 2278
The Court awarded costs to Ms Ma totalling $16,318.00, refused orders for indemnity or increased costs, fixed time band A for Mr Tay's security for costs application (limited time incurred) and time band B for Ms Ma's strike out application with an allowance for affidavit preparation by analogy to Schedule 3 allocations.
- Citation
- [2013] NZHC 2278
- Parties
- Plaintiff/defendant: Tian Min (Maggie) Ma; Plaintiff/defendant: Tony Meng Hiang Tay & Ors
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 3 September 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (security for Costs and Strike Out Applications) / Costs Determination Following Interlocutory Rulings
- Outcome
- Security for costs application refused; statement of claim struck out (previous ruling); costs awarded to Ms Ma in the sum of $16,318.00; indemnity/increased costs refused.
- Legal Topics
- Security for Costs, Strike Out, Costs Assessment, Time Banding, Summary Judgment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Tian Min (Maggie) Ma
Plaintiff/defendant
Tony Meng Hiang Tay & Ors
Plaintiff/defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil (security for Costs and Strike Out Applications) / Costs Determination Following Interlocutory Rulings
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether security for costs should be ordered against Ms Ma
- 2 Whether the statement of claim should be struck out as improperly commenced or duplicative
- 3 Appropriate costs scale and time banding for the interlocutory applications
Ratio Decidendi
The Court awarded costs to Ms Ma totalling $16,318.00, refused orders for indemnity or increased costs, fixed time band A for Mr Tay's security for costs application (limited time incurred) and time band B for Ms Ma's strike out application with an allowance for affidavit preparation by analogy to Schedule 3 allocations.
Court Disposition
Security for costs application refused; statement of claim struck out (previous ruling); costs awarded to Ms Ma in the sum of $16,318.00; indemnity/increased costs refused.
Orders
- Security for costs application by Mr Tay refused
- Statement of claim struck out (as previously ordered)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment