JAG MEDIA LTD v MAGNA SYSTEMS & ENGINEERING (NZ) LTD [2015] NZHC 2292
Given changed circumstances indicating a real risk to defendants of unrecoverable costs and that the claims have a genuine prospect of success justifying potential significant damages, the Court exercised its discretion under High Court Rules r 7.7 to order security for costs of $50,000 for each separately represented defendant grouping (total $150,000), vacated the imminent trial, and ordered that failure to post the security by the specified date will result in a stay of the proceeding.
- Citation
- [2015] NZHC 2292
- Parties
- First Plaintiff: JAG MEDIA LTD; Second Plaintiff: BCITV LTD (formerly BROADCAST INC LTD); First Defendant: MAGNA SYSTEMS & ENGINEERING (NZ) LTD; Second Defendant: COUNTRY TV LTD (formerly COUNTRY 99 TV LTD); Third Defendant: BROADCAST TRAFFIC SYSTEMS LTD; Fourth Defendant: DAVID HUGHES; Fifth Defendant: THE LIVING CHANNEL NEW ZEALAND LTD; Sixth Defendant: EYEWORKS NEW ZEALAND LTD
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 22 September 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Proceeding (high Court) / Pre Trial Interlocutory (security for Costs Application and Proposed Amendment)
- Outcome
- Application for security for costs granted; trial vacated; directions issued for filing of application to amend and case management; costs reserved.
- Legal Topics
- Security for Costs, Leave to Amend Statement of Claim, Case Management, Stay for Non Payment of Security
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
JAG MEDIA LTD
First Plaintiff
BCITV LTD (formerly BROADCAST INC LTD)
Second Plaintiff
MAGNA SYSTEMS & ENGINEERING (NZ) LTD
First Defendant
COUNTRY TV LTD (formerly COUNTRY 99 TV LTD)
Second Defendant
BROADCAST TRAFFIC SYSTEMS LTD
Third Defendant
DAVID HUGHES
Fourth Defendant
THE LIVING CHANNEL NEW ZEALAND LTD
Fifth Defendant
EYEWORKS NEW ZEALAND LTD
Sixth Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Proceeding (high Court) / Pre Trial Interlocutory (security for Costs Application and Proposed Amendment)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether security for costs should be ordered against the plaintiffs
- 2 Appropriate amount and structure of security for costs
- 3 Whether the October trial should proceed or be vacated in light of proposed amendments and new evidence
Ratio Decidendi
Given changed circumstances indicating a real risk to defendants of unrecoverable costs and that the claims have a genuine prospect of success justifying potential significant damages, the Court exercised its discretion under High Court Rules r 7.7 to order security for costs of $50,000 for each separately represented defendant grouping (total $150,000), vacated the imminent trial, and ordered that failure to post the security by the specified date will result in a stay of the proceeding.
Court Disposition
Application for security for costs granted; trial vacated; directions issued for filing of application to amend and case management; costs reserved.
Orders
- The trial fixture set to commence 12 October 2015 is vacated and appearances are excused
- Security for costs of $50,000 to be posted for each grouping of defendants who are separately represented (first and second defendants; third and fourth defendants; fifth and sixth defendants)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment