CLODE v SULLIVAN [2015] NZHC 2364
Security for costs was ordered because the judge was satisfied there was reason to believe the plaintiffs would be unable to pay defendants' costs if unsuccessful, aspects of the plaintiffs' pleaded case were weak or deficient, the volume of discovery imposed a real burden on defendants, and third party assistance did not remove the need to protect defendants; quantum was fixed at 50% of assessed recoverable costs: $25,000 as security for the First and Third Defendants and $17,500 as security for the Second Defendant, to be provided by 4 pm on 6 November 2015, failing which leave to apply; the proceeding was stayed pending provision of security.
- Citation
- [2015] NZHC 2364
- Parties
- First Plaintiff: Brent Douglas Clode; Second Plaintiff: Synergy Management Limited; First Defendant: Michael Grant Sullivan; First Defendant: Duthco Trustees (Sullivan) Limited as trustees of The Sullivan Family Trust No 1; Second Defendant: David Robert Jans; Third Defendant: Thompson Park Trust Limited as trustee of The Thompson Park Trust
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 29 September 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Civil: Application for Security for Costs Under High Court Rules R 5.45 Arising From Contractual and Property Disputes / Interim Application for Security for Costs Prior to Trial; Proceeding Stayed Pending Provision of Security
- Outcome
- Security for costs ordered; proceedings stayed pending provision of security
- Legal Topics
- Security for Costs, Discovery and Inspection, Contractual Remedies (cancellation), Third Party Litigation Funding, Costs Estimation, Share Ownership/transfer
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Brent Douglas Clode
First Plaintiff
Synergy Management Limited
Second Plaintiff
Michael Grant Sullivan
First Defendant
Duthco Trustees (Sullivan) Limited as trustees of The Sullivan Family Trust No 1
First Defendant
David Robert Jans
Second Defendant
Thompson Park Trust Limited as trustee of The Thompson Park Trust
Third Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil: Application for Security for Costs Under High Court Rules R 5.45 Arising From Contractual and Property Disputes / Interim Application for Security for Costs Prior to Trial; Proceeding Stayed Pending Provision of Security
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether to exercise discretion to order security for costs under High Court Rules r 5.45
- 2 Whether there is reason to believe plaintiffs will be unable to pay defendants' costs if unsuccessful
- 3 Appropriate quantum and form of security
Ratio Decidendi
Security for costs was ordered because the judge was satisfied there was reason to believe the plaintiffs would be unable to pay defendants' costs if unsuccessful, aspects of the plaintiffs' pleaded case were weak or deficient, the volume of discovery imposed a real burden on defendants, and third party assistance did not remove the need to protect defendants; quantum was fixed at 50% of assessed recoverable costs: $25,000 as security for the First and Third Defendants and $17,500 as security for the Second Defendant, to be provided by 4 pm on 6 November 2015, failing which leave to apply; the proceeding was stayed pending provision of security.
Court Disposition
Security for costs ordered; proceedings stayed pending provision of security
Orders
- First and Second Plaintiffs (Brent Douglas Clode and Synergy Management Limited) to provide security for costs for the First and Third Defendants in the sum of NZD 25,000 (being 50% of assessed costs of NZD 49,952)
- First Plaintiff (Brent Douglas Clode) to provide security for costs for the Second Defendant (David Robert Jans) in the sum of NZD 17,500
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment