ARCADIA HOMES LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION) v ANDREWS & ORS [2015] NZHC 2825
Defendants failed to establish the threshold that there is reason to believe plaintiffs will be unable to pay defendants' costs; the funding agreement and the apparent availability of funds under the trust/group structure (including proceeds of the Waimana sale) make inability unlikely; on the merits the plaintiffs' claims have sufficient substance to weigh against ordering security; accordingly the court declined to order security for costs and dismissed the applications.
- Citation
- [2015] NZHC 2825
- Parties
- First Plaintiff: Arcadia Homes Limited (in liquidation); Second Plaintiff: More To This Life Limited; Second Plaintiff: Andrew George Clark as trustee of the Ultimate Lifestyle Trust; First Defendant: Craig Raymond Andrews trading as McVeagh Fleming; Second Defendant: Andrew John Dexter Guest; Third Defendant: William James Dexter Guest; Fourth Defendant: Wyndham Trustees Limited; Fifth Defendant: Joint Family Trustees Limited; Sixth Defendant: Toms Properties Limited
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 13 November 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (company Liquidation; Creditors Claims; Professional Negligence and Trust Claims) / Application for Security for Costs (pre Trial Hearing)
- Outcome
- Application for security for costs declined
- Legal Topics
- Security for Costs, Directors' Duties, Breach of Fiduciary Duty, Knowing Assistance, Dispositions Prejudicing Creditors (property Law Act), Funding Agreements, Solvency Certificates, Costs Assessment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Arcadia Homes Limited (in liquidation)
First Plaintiff
More To This Life Limited
Second Plaintiff
Andrew George Clark as trustee of the Ultimate Lifestyle Trust
Second Plaintiff
Craig Raymond Andrews trading as McVeagh Fleming
First Defendant
Andrew John Dexter Guest
Second Defendant
William James Dexter Guest
Third Defendant
Wyndham Trustees Limited
Fourth Defendant
Joint Family Trustees Limited
Fifth Defendant
Toms Properties Limited
Sixth Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil (company Liquidation; Creditors Claims; Professional Negligence and Trust Claims) / Application for Security for Costs (pre Trial Hearing)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether there is reason to believe plaintiffs will be unable to pay defendants' costs (threshold under r 5.45)
- 2 Whether the court should exercise its discretion to order security for costs
- 3 Assessment of appropriate amount of security
Ratio Decidendi
Defendants failed to establish the threshold that there is reason to believe plaintiffs will be unable to pay defendants' costs; the funding agreement and the apparent availability of funds under the trust/group structure (including proceeds of the Waimana sale) make inability unlikely; on the merits the plaintiffs' claims have sufficient substance to weigh against ordering security; accordingly the court declined to order security for costs and dismissed the applications.
Court Disposition
Application for security for costs declined
Orders
- Parties to confer on costs and any costs order; if unable to agree applicants to file submissions (max seven pages) within 10 working days and respondents to file submissions (max seven pages) within a further 10 working days
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment