BURDEN v DIXIE CUMMINGS NZ LTD [2016] NZHC 729
Security for costs was ordered because plaintiffs were resident overseas, the evidence indicated an unwillingness to pay (including an unpaid Irish costs order) and enforcement against overseas entities raised practical difficulties; having found prima facie merits but not sufficient to displace security, the Court exercised its discretion to order staged security of NZD 75,000 for the copyright proceeding and NZD 50,000 for the trade mark proceeding, with non-payment resulting in a stay of the relevant proceeding and costs to the applicant on a 2B basis.
- Citation
- [2016] NZHC 729
- Parties
- First Plaintiff: Ian James Burden; Second Plaintiff: Plantation Grown Timbers (International) Limited; Third Plaintiff: Plantation Grown Timbers (Vietnam) Limited; First Defendant: Dixie Cummings New Zealand Limited; Second Defendant: Morrow Marketing Management Limited; Third Defendant: Craig Morrow; Fourth Defendant: Galaxy Home Vietnam Limited; Second Defendant: Burden Furniture (International) Limited; Third Defendant: Burden Furniture Co Limited; Fourth Defendant: Lindsay John Burden
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 19 April 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Interlocutory Application for Security for Costs in Related Copyright and Trade Mark Proceedings / Pre Trial, Interlocutory Application for Security for Costs Under High Court Rules R 5.45
- Outcome
- Security for costs granted in both proceedings; applicant awarded costs on a 2B basis for the single hearing
- Legal Topics
- Security for Costs, Enforcement of Foreign Judgments, Interlocutory Relief, Costs Orders, Stay Vs Strike Out
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ian James Burden
First Plaintiff
Plantation Grown Timbers (International) Limited
Second Plaintiff
Plantation Grown Timbers (Vietnam) Limited
Third Plaintiff
Dixie Cummings New Zealand Limited
First Defendant
Morrow Marketing Management Limited
Second Defendant
Craig Morrow
Third Defendant
Galaxy Home Vietnam Limited
Fourth Defendant
Burden Furniture (International) Limited
Second Defendant
Burden Furniture Co Limited
Third Defendant
Lindsay John Burden
Fourth Defendant
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application for Security for Costs in Related Copyright and Trade Mark Proceedings / Pre Trial, Interlocutory Application for Security for Costs Under High Court Rules R 5.45
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether security for costs should be ordered under r 5.45
- 2 Whether plaintiffs are unable or unwilling to pay adverse costs orders
- 3 Assessment of the merits of the plaintiffs' claims at interlocutory stage
Ratio Decidendi
Security for costs was ordered because plaintiffs were resident overseas, the evidence indicated an unwillingness to pay (including an unpaid Irish costs order) and enforcement against overseas entities raised practical difficulties; having found prima facie merits but not sufficient to displace security, the Court exercised its discretion to order staged security of NZD 75,000 for the copyright proceeding and NZD 50,000 for the trade mark proceeding, with non-payment resulting in a stay of the relevant proceeding and costs to the applicant on a 2B basis.
Court Disposition
Security for costs granted in both proceedings; applicant awarded costs on a 2B basis for the single hearing
Orders
- The plaintiffs shall provide security for costs in proceeding CIV-2015-485-001608 in the sum of $75,000 to be paid as follows: the sum of $15,000 to be paid into Court within 10 working days of receipt of this judgment; the sum of $25,000 to be paid into Court at least 10 working days prior to the date set for the...
- The plaintiffs shall provide security for costs in proceeding CIV-2014-404-002547 in the sum of $50,000 to be paid as follows: the sum of $10,000 to be paid into Court within 10 working days of receipt of this judgment; the sum of $15,000 to be paid into Court at least 10 working days prior to the date set for the...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment