R LEE AND H HEARD v G LEE AND J L LEE [2016] NZHC 1073
The court ordered limited particular discovery of HDP financial statements for 1998–2000, 2001 and 2002 as relevant to the 1997 and 2000 deeds, refused discovery for 2003–2016 as relating to quantum not liability (but left open reconsideration if plaintiffs succeed on liability), declined to authorize R Lee to represent the second plaintiff given the case complexity and the general rule against non-lawyer representation, ordered separate trials (liability first, quantum second), directed tailored discovery to be provided, and ordered security for costs by registration of a second mortgage over the plaintiffs' trust property at 101 Springfield Road Rotorua in a maximum sum of NZD 150,000...
- Citation
- [2016] NZHC 1073
- Parties
- First Plaintiff: Robert Lee (as trustee of the Estate of J G Lee); Second Plaintiff: Helen Heard (as trustee of the Estate of J G Lee); First Defendant: Gregory Lee; Second Defendant: Gregory Lee and Jane Lois Lee
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 23 May 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (trusts/equity Dispute) / Interlocutory Hearing (directions, Security for Costs, Discovery)
- Outcome
- Applications partly granted and partly refused; targeted discovery granted for early years, broader discovery refused at this stage, non-party orders not finally considered for lack of service, representation by R Lee refused, separate trials ordered, security for costs required by mortgage, proceeding stayed until...
- Legal Topics
- Security for Costs, Particular Discovery, Non Party Discovery, Separate Trials (liability and Quantum), Representation by Non Lawyer, Stay of Proceedings, Tailored Discovery
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Robert Lee (as trustee of the Estate of J G Lee)
First Plaintiff
Helen Heard (as trustee of the Estate of J G Lee)
Second Plaintiff
Gregory Lee
First Defendant
Gregory Lee and Jane Lois Lee
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil (trusts/equity Dispute) / Interlocutory Hearing (directions, Security for Costs, Discovery)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether HDP financial statements 1998–2002 and 2003–2016 should be discovered
- 2 Whether non-party disclosure orders could be made without notice to non-parties
- 3 Whether R Lee may represent the second plaintiff
Ratio Decidendi
The court ordered limited particular discovery of HDP financial statements for 1998–2000, 2001 and 2002 as relevant to the 1997 and 2000 deeds, refused discovery for 2003–2016 as relating to quantum not liability (but left open reconsideration if plaintiffs succeed on liability), declined to authorize R Lee to represent the second plaintiff given the case complexity and the general rule against non-lawyer representation, ordered separate trials (liability first, quantum second), directed tailored discovery to be provided, and ordered security for costs by registration of a second mortgage over the plaintiffs' trust property at 101 Springfield Road Rotorua in a maximum sum of NZD 150,000...
Court Disposition
Applications partly granted and partly refused; targeted discovery granted for early years, broader discovery refused at this stage, non-party orders not finally considered for lack of service, representation by R Lee refused, separate trials ordered, security for costs required by mortgage, proceeding stayed until...
Orders
- HDP financial statements for 1998–2000 and for 2001–2002 to be discovered by the plaintiffs
- Discovery of HDP financial statements for 2003–2016 refused at this stage (may be reconsidered if plaintiffs succeed on liability)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment