MONNERY v PARSONS [2023] NZHC 1595
Court held there had been a sufficient change in character and material circumstances (addition of three causes of action, doubling of claimed quantum, increased complexity and protraction, and continued non‑disclosure of plaintiffs' financial position) to justify revisiting the prior security order; it exercised discretion to order further global security for costs in the total sum of NZD 150,000 payable in staged tranches and ordered discovery of financial records including IR3 tax returns; failure to pay staged amounts when due will stay the plaintiffs' proceeding until payment.
- Citation
- [2023] NZHC 1595
- Parties
- First Plaintiff: Paul Mark Monnery; Second Plaintiffs: Paul Mark Monnery and Julie Ann Monnery; First Defendant: Andrew Graham Parsons; Second Defendant: John Murray Creighton; Third Defendant: Bruce Gordon Copeland; Fourth Defendant: Kurt Bredenbech; Fifth Defendant: Murray Charles Parsons; Sixth Defendant: Push Developments Limited; Seventh Defendant: Sandfield Associates Limited; Eighth Defendant: Sandfield Ventures Limited; Ninth Defendant: P K B Investments Limited
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 26 June 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Proceeding (economic Torts, Breach of Confidence, Fiduciary and Equitable Remedies) / Pre‑trial Applications for Further Security for Costs and Discovery; Trial Listed July 2024 (15 Working Days)
- Outcome
- Further security for costs ordered and discovery order granted; costs of the application reserved
- Legal Topics
- Security for Costs, Discovery, Breach of Confidence, Economic Torts (unlawful Means, Conspiracy), Breach of Fiduciary Duty, Accounting of Profits, Constructive Trust, Third Party Funding Disclosure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Paul Mark Monnery
First Plaintiff
Paul Mark Monnery and Julie Ann Monnery
Second Plaintiffs
Andrew Graham Parsons
First Defendant
John Murray Creighton
Second Defendant
Bruce Gordon Copeland
Third Defendant
Kurt Bredenbech
Fourth Defendant
Murray Charles Parsons
Fifth Defendant
Push Developments Limited
Sixth Defendant
Sandfield Associates Limited
Seventh Defendant
Sandfield Ventures Limited
Eighth Defendant
P K B Investments Limited
Ninth Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Proceeding (economic Torts, Breach of Confidence, Fiduciary and Equitable Remedies) / Pre‑trial Applications for Further Security for Costs and Discovery; Trial Listed July 2024 (15 Working Days)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether r 5.45(1) threshold is met (reason to believe plaintiffs cannot pay defendants' costs)
- 2 Whether, given change in proceedings and/or plaintiffs' financial circumstances, it is just to order further security for costs
- 3 What quantum and staging of security is appropriate
Ratio Decidendi
Court held there had been a sufficient change in character and material circumstances (addition of three causes of action, doubling of claimed quantum, increased complexity and protraction, and continued non‑disclosure of plaintiffs' financial position) to justify revisiting the prior security order; it exercised discretion to order further global security for costs in the total sum of NZD 150,000 payable in staged tranches and ordered discovery of financial records including IR3 tax returns; failure to pay staged amounts when due will stay the plaintiffs' proceeding until payment.
Court Disposition
Further security for costs ordered and discovery order granted; costs of the application reserved
Orders
- Security for costs totalling NZD 150000 payable to the Registrar of the High Court at Wellington as global security for costs of all defendant applicants;
- Security to be paid in stages: NZD 25000 on case being set down for trial (already paid), NZD 40000 on close of pleadings, NZD 40000 on date of service of plaintiffs' evidence, NZD 45000 three months prior to trial
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment