Select Appointments Limited v Accident Compensation Corporation

Select Appointments Limited v Accident Compensation Corporation

The judge accepted the contemporaneous medical evidence that the claimant suffered cervical nerve root irritation causally related to her work posture and duties when the claim was lodged in June 1995, satisfying s7(1)(a) and (b) of the ARCI Act 1992; therefore the ACC decision accepting the work injury was correct...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2001] NZACC 189
Parties
Appellant: Select Appointments Limited; First Respondent: Accident Compensation Corporation; Second Respondent: Helen Margaret Doomen
Court
District Court
Jurisdiction
New Zealand
Judgment Date
16 July 2001
Procedural Posture
Appeal Under Accident Insurance Act 1998 S152 / Judgment on the Papers (district Court Decision)
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; ACC decision accepting the claim confirmed
Legal Topics
Gradual Process Injury, Causation, Medical Evidence, Coverage Decision, Appeal and Review
Accident Compensation Personal Injury Employment Law Administrative Law Gradual Process Injury Causation Medical Evidence Coverage Decision +1 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Select Appointments Limited

Appellant

Accident Compensation Corporation

First Respondent

Helen Margaret Doomen

Second Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal Under Accident Insurance Act 1998 S152 / Judgment on the Papers (district Court Decision)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the claimant suffered a 'personal injury' due to gradual process arising out of work under s7(1) ARCI Act 1992
  2. 2 Whether contemporaneous medical evidence established causation between work tasks and the diagnosed condition
  3. 3 Whether non-work factors caused or materially contributed to the condition at time of claim

Ratio Decidendi

The judge accepted the contemporaneous medical evidence that the claimant suffered cervical nerve root irritation causally related to her work posture and duties when the claim was lodged in June 1995, satisfying s7(1)(a) and (b) of the ARCI Act 1992; therefore the ACC decision accepting the work injury was correct and the appellant's appeal was dismissed.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; ACC decision accepting the claim confirmed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed
  • Appellant to pay second respondent's costs of $1,000