WILLBURN FURNITURE AND RESTORATIONS LTD (IN LIQUIDATION) v GLEDHILL [2016] NZHC 331
Court found on the evidence that the company was insolvent by 31 March 2014, the transfer of the van to the first defendant and the payment of auction proceeds into the second defendant's personal account were dispositions of company assets that prejudiced creditors, and the first defendant systematically withdrew...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2016] NZHC 331
- Parties
- First Plaintiff: Willburn Furniture and Restorations Ltd (In Liquidation); Second Plaintiff: Colin David Owens; Second Plaintiff: Grant Stephen Jarrold; First Defendant: Matthew Lawrence Gledhill; Second Defendant: Cameron Matthew Gledhill
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 2 March 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Company Liquidation Creditor Recovery (civil) / Judgment Following Proof Hearing
- Outcome
- Judgment for plaintiffs. First defendant ordered to compensate company for van and repay shareholder drawings; second defendant ordered to repay retained auction proceeds; alternative and additional relief under s 301 awarded against first defendant to the extent unpaid; interest awarded; costs reserved with second...
- Legal Topics
- Setting Aside Dispositions Prejudicing Creditors, Directors' Duties and Breaches, Reckless Trading, Misappropriation of Company Funds, Liquidator Claims Under S 301 Companies Act, Recovery of Liquidation Expenses
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Willburn Furniture and Restorations Ltd (In Liquidation)
First Plaintiff
Colin David Owens
Second Plaintiff
Grant Stephen Jarrold
Second Plaintiff
Matthew Lawrence Gledhill
First Defendant
Cameron Matthew Gledhill
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Company Liquidation Creditor Recovery (civil) / Judgment Following Proof Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether dispositions (van transfer and auction proceeds) prejudiced creditors under s 346-350 Property Law Act 2007
- 2 Whether company was insolvent by 31 March 2014
- 3 Whether dispositions were made with intent to hinder, delay or defeat creditors
Ratio Decidendi
Court found on the evidence that the company was insolvent by 31 March 2014, the transfer of the van to the first defendant and the payment of auction proceeds into the second defendant's personal account were dispositions of company assets that prejudiced creditors, and the first defendant systematically withdrew company funds for personal use. The first defendant breached duties under ss 131,133,135 and 137. Remedies awarded: compensation under s 348 for the van ($13,300) and auction proceeds ($22,680.08) with interest, judgment for repayment of shareholder current account drawings ($91,995.79) with interest, alternative relief under s 301 quantified by reference to creditors' losses...
Court Disposition
Judgment for plaintiffs. First defendant ordered to compensate company for van and repay shareholder drawings; second defendant ordered to repay retained auction proceeds; alternative and additional relief under s 301 awarded against first defendant to the extent unpaid; interest awarded; costs reserved with second...
Orders
- First defendant to pay the company $13,300 in compensation for the van plus interest from date of liquidation
- Second defendant to pay the company $22,680.08 in compensation for auction proceeds plus interest from date of liquidation
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment