HENRY DAVID LEVIN AND DAVID STUART VANCE AS LIQUIDATORS OF MULTI CONSTRUCTION CONCEPTS (MCC) LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION) V SHOT BLAST SERVICES (AUCK) LIMITED HC AK CIV 2012-404-000433
On the evidence the liquidators failed to prove the first payment was outside the ordinary course and Shot Blast successfully rebutted the presumption for the second and third payments; consequently the three payments in issue were made in the ordinary course of business and cannot be set aside under s292; matters...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- openlaw-51543035_dcd1_4a15_9962_7335d67a88f6.pdf
- Parties
- Applicant (liquidators): Henry David Levin and David Stuart Vance as liquidators of Multi Construction Concepts (MCC) Limited (in liquidation); Respondent: Shot Blast Services (Auck) Limited
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 21 December 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Companies Act S294(5) Application to Set Aside Payments (voidable Transactions) / Interim Judgment on Whether Three Payments Were in the Ordinary Course of Business; S296 Defence and Other Issues Reserved
- Outcome
- Liquidators' application dismissed insofar as it related to the three payments on 29 June 2007, 21 September 2007 and 8 October 2007; Shot Blast entitled to resist setting aside those payments as they were made in the ordinary course of business; other issues reserved.
- Legal Topics
- Voidable Transactions, Ordinary Course of Business, Preference, Companies Act S292, S296 Defence
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Henry David Levin and David Stuart Vance as liquidators of Multi Construction Concepts (MCC) Limited (in liquidation)
Applicant (liquidators)
Shot Blast Services (Auck) Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Companies Act S294(5) Application to Set Aside Payments (voidable Transactions) / Interim Judgment on Whether Three Payments Were in the Ordinary Course of Business; S296 Defence and Other Issues Reserved
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether three payments made on 29 June 2007, 21 September 2007 and 8 October 2007 were made in the ordinary course of business and thus not voidable under s292 of the Companies Act 1993
- 2 Application of the presumption in the restricted period under s292(3) and which party bears the onus
- 3 Whether issue estoppel arose from the earlier application to set aside default judgment
Ratio Decidendi
On the evidence the liquidators failed to prove the first payment was outside the ordinary course and Shot Blast successfully rebutted the presumption for the second and third payments; consequently the three payments in issue were made in the ordinary course of business and cannot be set aside under s292; matters relating to s296 defences and later payments were reserved.
Court Disposition
Liquidators' application dismissed insofar as it related to the three payments on 29 June 2007, 21 September 2007 and 8 October 2007; Shot Blast entitled to resist setting aside those payments as they were made in the ordinary course of business; other issues reserved.
Orders
- No other orders at this time
- Costs reserved on the point decided
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment