WANO v NEW ZEALAND POLICE [2019] NZHC 1016

WANO v NEW ZEALAND POLICE [2019] NZHC 1016

Given the availability and suitability of the proposed address, the appellant's demonstrated commitment to rehabilitation, the availability of meaningful local rehabilitation programmes and having regard to time already served, the appropriate sentence was home detention (eight months on the lead charge, two months...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] NZHC 1016
Parties
Appellant: Sonia Te Au Wano; Respondent: New Zealand Police
Court
High Court
Jurisdiction
New Zealand
Judgment Date
10 May 2019
Procedural Posture
Appeal Against Sentence / Judgment
Outcome
Appeal allowed in part; original sentences of imprisonment quashed and replaced with home detention
Legal Topics
Home Detention, Rehabilitation, Concurrent Sentences, Electronic Monitoring, Time Served Credit
Criminal Law Sentencing Drugs Law Corrections Home Detention Rehabilitation Concurrent Sentences Electronic Monitoring +1 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Sonia Te Au Wano

Appellant

New Zealand Police

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal Against Sentence / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether home detention was appropriate in place of imprisonment
  2. 2 Whether the appellant's rehabilitation prospects and availability of address/programmes justified non-custodial sentence
  3. 3 How to account for time already served

Ratio Decidendi

Given the availability and suitability of the proposed address, the appellant's demonstrated commitment to rehabilitation, the availability of meaningful local rehabilitation programmes and having regard to time already served, the appropriate sentence was home detention (eight months on the lead charge, two months concurrently on others), with the prior imprisonment quashed.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed in part; original sentences of imprisonment quashed and replaced with home detention

Orders

  • Quash all sentences of imprisonment imposed 17 January 2019
  • Sentence appellant to eight months home detention on lead charge of possession of cannabis plant for supply