RICCARTON CONSTRUCTION LIMITED V COLJON LIMITED HC CHCH CIV-2010-409-000848

RICCARTON CONSTRUCTION LIMITED V COLJON LIMITED HC CHCH CIV-2010-409-000848

The Court held there was no genuine and substantial dispute as to the judgment debt given the clear findings in the 4 March 2010 judgment; procedural irregularities (failure to file a verifying affidavit and initial delay) were curable under r1.5 and did not nullify the proceeding; Riccarton had not shown clear and...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
openlaw-ff50e32b_9f96_466f_a2b9_b7ed23f00f3c.pdf
Parties
Applicant/defendant: Riccarton Construction Limited; Respondent/plaintiff: Coljon Limited
Court
High Court
Jurisdiction
New Zealand
Judgment Date
6 July 2010
Procedural Posture
Company Liquidation Proceeding / Interlocutory Application for Stay (dismissed)
Outcome
application dismissed
Legal Topics
Statutory Demand, Stay of Proceedings, Liquidation, High Court Rules R31.11, Verifying Affidavit, Abuse of Process, Costs Orders, Appeal Procedure
Company Law Insolvency Civil Procedure Statutory Demand Stay of Proceedings Liquidation High Court Rules R31.11 Verifying Affidavit +3 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Riccarton Construction Limited

Applicant/defendant

Coljon Limited

Respondent/plaintiff

Procedural Posture

Company Liquidation Proceeding / Interlocutory Application for Stay (dismissed)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether to stay liquidation proceedings pending appeal of judgment of 4 March 2010
  2. 2 Whether there exists a genuine and substantial dispute as to the debt asserted by Coljon
  3. 3 Whether procedural irregularities (failure to file verifying affidavit; delay under r31.3/r31.11) nullify jurisdiction or are curable

Ratio Decidendi

The Court held there was no genuine and substantial dispute as to the judgment debt given the clear findings in the 4 March 2010 judgment; procedural irregularities (failure to file a verifying affidavit and initial delay) were curable under r1.5 and did not nullify the proceeding; Riccarton had not shown clear and persuasive grounds to justify a stay and the balance of convenience favoured Coljon, therefore the application for stay was dismissed.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • Order extending time for the application to have been filed to 4:00 pm, 18 June 2010
  • Leave granted to file and read late affidavits filed by the parties