NEIL MARTIN CLARKE V COREY DANIEL WATTS HC WN CIV 2006-485-2461
Because Dobson J dismissed the application to review the Associate Judge's order for costs, the sum held by the Registrar ($4,901.18 plus accumulated interest) represented the costs award and must be paid to the solicitors for Mr Watts.
- Citation
- openlaw-4b392dcd_879c_4b18_9a0a_c4459b24ff73.pdf
- Parties
- Debtor / Plaintiff: Neil Martin Clarke; Creditor / Defendant: Corey Daniel Watts
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 7 September 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Insolvency / Bankruptcy (insolvency Act 1967) / Post Judgment Enforcement — Application for Release of Monies Held by Court
- Outcome
- Funds released to judgment creditor
- Legal Topics
- Stay of Execution, Costs Orders, Payment Into Court, Release of Funds
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Neil Martin Clarke
Debtor / Plaintiff
Corey Daniel Watts
Creditor / Defendant
Procedural Posture
Insolvency / Bankruptcy (insolvency Act 1967) / Post Judgment Enforcement — Application for Release of Monies Held by Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether funds paid into court should be released to the judgment creditor
- 2 Whether the sum held represented the costs award and accumulated interest
- 3 Effect of dismissal of the review application on entitlement to the funds
Ratio Decidendi
Because Dobson J dismissed the application to review the Associate Judge's order for costs, the sum held by the Registrar ($4,901.18 plus accumulated interest) represented the costs award and must be paid to the solicitors for Mr Watts.
Court Disposition
Funds released to judgment creditor
Orders
- Pay $4,901.18 plus accumulated interest to the solicitors for Mr Watts
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment