CLUB MARINE (NZ) LIMITED v QUADRANT YACHTS LIMITED [2019] NZHC 48

CLUB MARINE (NZ) LIMITED v QUADRANT YACHTS LIMITED [2019] NZHC 48

Quadrant was not insured under the Transit Policy and the agency agreement did not operate to extend insurance to Quadrant for its own negligence or contractual breaches; therefore Quadrant had no arguable cause of action against Club Marine and summary judgment in favour of Club Marine was appropriate.

Citation
[2019] NZHC 48
Parties
Appellant / Insurer: Club Marine (NZ) Limited; Respondent / Sales Broker: Quadrant Yachts Limited; Owner / Plaintiff in Subrogated Proceedings: Crystal-Line Limited
Court
High Court
Jurisdiction
New Zealand
Judgment Date
1 February 2019
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal From District Court Summary Judgment Application (insurance/contract) / High Court Determination on Appeal and Summary Judgment
Outcome
Appeal allowed; summary judgment entered for Club Marine; Quadrant's causes of action dismissed; cross‑appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Subrogation, Co Insured Status, Summary Judgment, Costs as Damages, Agency Agreement, Insurable Interest, Indemnity
Insurance Law Contract Law Civil Procedure Costs Law Tort – Negligence Subrogation Co Insured Status Summary Judgment +4 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 15 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Club Marine (NZ) Limited

Appellant / Insurer

Quadrant Yachts Limited

Respondent / Sales Broker

Crystal-Line Limited

Owner / Plaintiff in Subrogated Proceedings

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal From District Court Summary Judgment Application (insurance/contract) / High Court Determination on Appeal and Summary Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether Quadrant was an insured under the Transit Policy for the loss that arose
  2. 2 Whether the agency agreement rendered Quadrant a co-insured or entitled it to an indemnity
  3. 3 Whether costs incurred in the substantive proceeding could be recovered as damages in a separate proceeding

Ratio Decidendi

Quadrant was not insured under the Transit Policy and the agency agreement did not operate to extend insurance to Quadrant for its own negligence or contractual breaches; therefore Quadrant had no arguable cause of action against Club Marine and summary judgment in favour of Club Marine was appropriate.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; summary judgment entered for Club Marine; Quadrant's causes of action dismissed; cross‑appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Summary judgment entered on Club Marine's statement of defence; Quadrant's causes of action dismissed
  • Cross-appeal dismissed