MCCREADY v GREEN CABS [2013] NZHC 2594
Adjudication was ordered because the debtor's proposal was speculative, lacked reliable evidence of lump sums or increased income, would deliver only a modest return (circa 24 cents in the dollar) and therefore it was not just and equitable to refuse adjudication under s37.
- Citation
- [2013] NZHC 2594
- Parties
- Judgment Debtor: Graham Edward McCready; Judgment Creditor: Green Cabs Limited
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 4 October 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Bankruptcy Adjudication Under Insolvency Act 2006 / Adjudication Hearing and Judgment
- Outcome
- Order adjudicating Graham Edward McCready bankrupt made
- Legal Topics
- Summary Instalment Order, Adjudication Under S37, Debtor Insolvency Proposals, Creditor Enforcement
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Graham Edward McCready
Judgment Debtor
Green Cabs Limited
Judgment Creditor
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy Adjudication Under Insolvency Act 2006 / Adjudication Hearing and Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether to make an order of adjudication under Insolvency Act 2006 s37
- 2 Whether a summary instalment order was a viable alternative to adjudication
- 3 Whether the debtor's unsecured debts exceeded the $40,000 threshold for summary instalment orders
Ratio Decidendi
Adjudication was ordered because the debtor's proposal was speculative, lacked reliable evidence of lump sums or increased income, would deliver only a modest return (circa 24 cents in the dollar) and therefore it was not just and equitable to refuse adjudication under s37.
Court Disposition
Order adjudicating Graham Edward McCready bankrupt made
Orders
- Order adjudicating Graham Edward McCready bankrupt made on 2 October 2013 at 11:01 a.m.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment