THE ORTHODONTIC CENTRE LTD V M D COURTNEY ORTHODONTICS LTD AND ANOR HC PMN CIV-2006-454-238
Summary judgment was refused because defendants had arguable defences and factual disputes precluded judgment as a matter of law; liquidation was refused because the company was solvent with no creditors and the necessary strong case for winding up was not established; instead, the court ordered relief under Companies Act s174(2)(a) to require Mr Tobin (or his nominee) to acquire the Courtney interests at fair market value using an expert valuer (appointed by agreement or by the President of the New Zealand Society of Accountants if not agreed), with valuation date 1 February 2006, payment and transfer within 28 days, costs of the expert shared equally, and ancillary indemnities and...
- Citation
- openlaw-a2340163_6906_499c_9615_c66692998558.pdf
- Parties
- Plaintiff (civ 2006 454 238; Plaintiff in CIV 2006 454 419): The Orthodontic Centre Ltd; First Defendant (civ 2006 454 238); Plaintiff (civ 2006 454 365); Second Defendant (civ 2006 454 419): M D Courtney Orthodontics Ltd; Second Defendant (civ 2006 454 238): Michael David Courtney; Plaintiff (civ 2006 454 419): N M Tobin Orthodontics Ltd; Defendant (civ 2006 454 365; First Defendant CIV 2006 454 419): The Specialist Orthodontic Centre Ltd
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 5 September 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Multiple Actions (summary Judgment Application; Liquidation Application; Companies Act S174(2)(a) Share Acquisition) / Oral Judgment Disposing of Interlocutory Applications and Directing Interlocutory Case Management
- Outcome
- Summary judgment dismissed; liquidation application dismissed; order made under Companies Act s174(2)(a) for acquisition of shares at fair market value; ancillary indemnities and director resignation ordered; costs reserved.
- Legal Topics
- Summary Judgment, Liquidation, Companies Act S174(2)(a) Share Acquisition, Share Valuation, Indemnity, Director Resignation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Orthodontic Centre Ltd
Plaintiff (civ 2006 454 238; Plaintiff in CIV 2006 454 419)
M D Courtney Orthodontics Ltd
First Defendant (civ 2006 454 238); Plaintiff (civ 2006 454 365); Second Defendant (civ 2006 454 419)
Michael David Courtney
Second Defendant (civ 2006 454 238)
N M Tobin Orthodontics Ltd
Plaintiff (civ 2006 454 419)
The Specialist Orthodontic Centre Ltd
Defendant (civ 2006 454 365; First Defendant CIV 2006 454 419)
Procedural Posture
Civil Multiple Actions (summary Judgment Application; Liquidation Application; Companies Act S174(2)(a) Share Acquisition) / Oral Judgment Disposing of Interlocutory Applications and Directing Interlocutory Case Management
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether summary judgment was appropriate against defendants
- 2 Whether liquidation of The Specialist Orthodontic Centre Ltd was appropriate
- 3 Whether the Court should order acquisition of shares under Companies Act s174(2)(a) to resolve deadlock
Ratio Decidendi
Summary judgment was refused because defendants had arguable defences and factual disputes precluded judgment as a matter of law; liquidation was refused because the company was solvent with no creditors and the necessary strong case for winding up was not established; instead, the court ordered relief under Companies Act s174(2)(a) to require Mr Tobin (or his nominee) to acquire the Courtney interests at fair market value using an expert valuer (appointed by agreement or by the President of the New Zealand Society of Accountants if not agreed), with valuation date 1 February 2006, payment and transfer within 28 days, costs of the expert shared equally, and ancillary indemnities and...
Court Disposition
Summary judgment dismissed; liquidation application dismissed; order made under Companies Act s174(2)(a) for acquisition of shares at fair market value; ancillary indemnities and director resignation ordered; costs reserved.
Orders
- Summary judgment application dismissed; costs reserved.
- Liquidation application (CIV-2006-454-365) dismissed; costs reserved.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment