JACK AND ANOR V CARVER AND ORS HC AK CIV-2008-404-005910
Decline to stay execution of the judgment pending appeal because defendants' limited means and control of assets risk erosion of plaintiffs' security; allow plaintiffs to sell assets in execution provided net proceeds are deposited with an independent stakeholder pending appeal; refuse order compelling production of the original deed because the deed was not essential to the summary judgment and no basis was shown that the applicant sought the original from the correct holder; require correction of charging orders to reflect separate liabilities.
- Citation
- openlaw-5386a086_7d66_443a_8b30_82db5cba8e88.pdf
- Parties
- First Plaintiff: Neil Clarence Jack; Second Plaintiffs: Neil Clarence Jack and Alan Robert Jack; First Defendant: Shirley-Anne Carver; Second Defendant: Garry Desmond Stewart; Third Defendants: Shirley-Anne Carver, Garry Desmond Stewart and Haydn Ash
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 17 August 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Proceedings (summary Judgment, Charging and Freezing Orders) / Post Judgment Applications: Application to Stay Execution Pending Appeal and Application for Production of Original Document; Appeal Pending
- Outcome
- Application for stay dismissed with condition; application for production of original document dismissed; costs awarded to plaintiffs.
- Legal Topics
- Summary Judgment, Freezing Order, Charging Order, Stay Pending Appeal, Production of Documents, Forensic Examination, Costs
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Neil Clarence Jack
First Plaintiff
Neil Clarence Jack and Alan Robert Jack
Second Plaintiffs
Shirley-Anne Carver
First Defendant
Garry Desmond Stewart
Second Defendant
Shirley-Anne Carver, Garry Desmond Stewart and Haydn Ash
Third Defendants
Procedural Posture
Civil Proceedings (summary Judgment, Charging and Freezing Orders) / Post Judgment Applications: Application to Stay Execution Pending Appeal and Application for Production of Original Document; Appeal Pending
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether to stay execution of the judgment pending appeal
- 2 Whether to order production of original deed of acknowledgement for forensic examination
- 3 Whether charging orders properly secure only the judgment of the owner of charged land
Ratio Decidendi
Decline to stay execution of the judgment pending appeal because defendants' limited means and control of assets risk erosion of plaintiffs' security; allow plaintiffs to sell assets in execution provided net proceeds are deposited with an independent stakeholder pending appeal; refuse order compelling production of the original deed because the deed was not essential to the summary judgment and no basis was shown that the applicant sought the original from the correct holder; require correction of charging orders to reflect separate liabilities.
Court Disposition
Application for stay dismissed with condition; application for production of original document dismissed; costs awarded to plaintiffs.
Orders
- Application for stay dismissed; if plaintiffs sell properties by way of execution the net proceeds of sale must be held on deposit with an independent stakeholder pending the outcome of the appeal or further order of the Court
- Application requiring Lisa Jack to present the original deed of acknowledgement dated 16 October 2002 for forensic examination dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment