JACK AND ANOR V CARVER AND ORS HC AK CIV 2008-404-5610
Documentary evidence (loan agreements, deed of guarantee, deed of acknowledgement and deed of assignment) established prima facie indebtedness; assignment to plaintiff and statutory/common law rights of a guarantor who pays entitled plaintiff to recover; defendants' asserted estoppel and oral agreement defences were not tenable against clear written instruments and affidavit evidence; plaintiffs demonstrated sufficient evidence of risk of dissipation and failure to disclose to justify continuation of the freezing order, so summary judgment and related relief were granted on causes 2, 3 and 4.
- Citation
- openlaw-f38225da_86df_4009_aec6_6327e1b99997.pdf
- Parties
- First Plaintiff: NEIL CLARENCE JACK; Second Plaintiffs: NEIL CLARENCE JACK AND ALAN ROBERT JACK AS TRUSTEES OF THE JACK FAMILY TRUST; First Defendant: SHIRLEY ANNE CARVER; Second Defendant: GARRY DESMOND STEWART; Third Defendants: SHIRLEY-ANNE CARVER, GARRY DESMOND STEWART AND HAYDN AS TRUSTEES OF THE WHITIORA TRUST
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 14 April 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Debt and Guarantor Indemnity / Summary Judgment Application and Interlocutory Applications (freezing Order and Disclosure Enforcement)
- Outcome
- Summary judgment entered for plaintiffs on the second, third and fourth causes of action; defendants' application to discharge freezing order dismissed; enforcement/disclosure orders granted in part.
- Legal Topics
- Summary Judgment, Assignment of Debt, Guarantor's Indemnity, Freezing Order (mareva Injunction), Estoppel by Representation and Change of Position, Deed of Acknowledgement of Debt
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
NEIL CLARENCE JACK
First Plaintiff
NEIL CLARENCE JACK AND ALAN ROBERT JACK AS TRUSTEES OF THE JACK FAMILY TRUST
Second Plaintiffs
SHIRLEY ANNE CARVER
First Defendant
GARRY DESMOND STEWART
Second Defendant
SHIRLEY-ANNE CARVER, GARRY DESMOND STEWART AND HAYDN AS TRUSTEES OF THE WHITIORA TRUST
Third Defendants
Procedural Posture
Debt and Guarantor Indemnity / Summary Judgment Application and Interlocutory Applications (freezing Order and Disclosure Enforcement)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether defendants have any tenable defence to the claims founded on documented loan instruments and assignment
- 2 Whether Provincial Finance debt assignment to plaintiff validly vested rights enabling recovery
- 3 Whether guarantor (plaintiff) who paid creditor is entitled to indemnity from principal debtors
Ratio Decidendi
Documentary evidence (loan agreements, deed of guarantee, deed of acknowledgement and deed of assignment) established prima facie indebtedness; assignment to plaintiff and statutory/common law rights of a guarantor who pays entitled plaintiff to recover; defendants' asserted estoppel and oral agreement defences were not tenable against clear written instruments and affidavit evidence; plaintiffs demonstrated sufficient evidence of risk of dissipation and failure to disclose to justify continuation of the freezing order, so summary judgment and related relief were granted on causes 2, 3 and 4.
Court Disposition
Summary judgment entered for plaintiffs on the second, third and fourth causes of action; defendants' application to discharge freezing order dismissed; enforcement/disclosure orders granted in part.
Orders
- Judgment for the first plaintiff against the first and second defendants on the second cause of action in the sum of $981,853.35 together with interest as claimed and costs on a 2B basis
- Judgment for the first plaintiff against the third defendants on the third cause of action in the sum of $159,665 together with interest as claimed and costs on a 2B basis; liability of third defendant Haydn Ash limited to the assets of the Whitiora Trust
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment