P L FLETCHER AND M E FLETCHER (AS TRUSTEES OF THE P L & M E FLETCHER FAMILY TRUST) V P A HULL AND B A HULL AND ANOR HC WHA CIV-2009-488-000762
Defendants failed to settle and plaintiffs validly cancelled the contract, but summary judgment on liability was inappropriate because quantum and counterclaim issues remain that require a full hearing; accordingly the court issued case management directions, reserved costs on the plaintiffs' summary judgment application, and made a limited costs order in favour of the second defendant for filing its notice of opposition only.
- Citation
- openlaw-fcf02687_5f24_4577_9c1c_1b4755c7e838.pdf
- Parties
- Plaintiffs: P L Fletcher and M E Fletcher (as trustees of the P L & M E Fletcher Family Trust); First Defendants: P A Hull and B A Hull; Second Defendant: Falls Road Properties Ltd
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 20 April 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Sale and Purchase of Land; Contract Dispute; Summary Judgment Application / Application for Summary Judgment; Case Management Directions Issued; Conference Set 19 July 2010
- Outcome
- Summary judgment on liability not entered; plaintiffs' summary judgment application declined insofar as final relief was sought; case management directions issued; costs reserved on plaintiffs' summary judgment application; second defendant awarded limited costs for filing notice of opposition only.
- Legal Topics
- Summary Judgment, Cancellation of Contract, Settlement Notice, Deposit, Counterclaim, Jurisdiction of Associate Judge
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
P L Fletcher and M E Fletcher (as trustees of the P L & M E Fletcher Family Trust)
Plaintiffs
P A Hull and B A Hull
First Defendants
Falls Road Properties Ltd
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Sale and Purchase of Land; Contract Dispute; Summary Judgment Application / Application for Summary Judgment; Case Management Directions Issued; Conference Set 19 July 2010
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether defendants' failure to settle entitled vendors to cancel the contract
- 2 Whether summary judgment on liability can be entered where quantum remains contested
- 3 Whether payments made by defendants constitute over-payment actionable by counterclaim
Ratio Decidendi
Defendants failed to settle and plaintiffs validly cancelled the contract, but summary judgment on liability was inappropriate because quantum and counterclaim issues remain that require a full hearing; accordingly the court issued case management directions, reserved costs on the plaintiffs' summary judgment application, and made a limited costs order in favour of the second defendant for filing its notice of opposition only.
Court Disposition
Summary judgment on liability not entered; plaintiffs' summary judgment application declined insofar as final relief was sought; case management directions issued; costs reserved on plaintiffs' summary judgment application; second defendant awarded limited costs for filing notice of opposition only.
Orders
- Within 10 working days plaintiffs to file and serve any amended statement of claim
- Within 10 working days first defendants to file any counterclaim they wish to issue
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment