WI LUPTON AND AE SYMES AND RJ LUPTON AS TRUSTEES OF THE LUPTON TRUST V GM HOOPER AND MR HUGHES AS EXECUTORS AND TRUSTEES OF THE ESTATE OF ANNE MACDONALD LUPTON HC WANG CIV-2011-483-232
Evidence, including contemporaneous affidavits and the estate's Schedule of Assets and Liabilities, established the $13,569.46 was a loan from the Lupton Trust to the estate which was not gifted and remains repayable; the Disputes Tribunal claim is a personal claim against Warwick Lupton and cannot be set off against the Trust's claim; therefore defendants had no real defence and summary judgment is warranted.
- Citation
- openlaw-ff58db9d_91cc_4c98_a1d6_f7bfb2559a56.pdf
- Parties
- Plaintiff Trustee of the Lupton Trust: Warwick Isaac Lupton; Plaintiff Trustee of the Lupton Trust: Antony Edward Symes; Plaintiff Trustee of the Lupton Trust: Ruth Jennifer Lupton; Defendant Executor and Trustee of the Estate of Anne Mac Donald Lupton: Gillian Margaret Hooper; Defendant Executor and Trustee of the Estate of Anne Mac Donald Lupton: Murray Roy Hughes
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 8 December 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Summary Judgment Application / Application Heard and Judgment Delivered
- Outcome
- Summary judgment granted for plaintiffs
- Legal Topics
- Summary Judgment, Loan to Estate, Set Off and Counterclaim, Executor Obligations
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Warwick Isaac Lupton
Plaintiff Trustee of the Lupton Trust
Antony Edward Symes
Plaintiff Trustee of the Lupton Trust
Ruth Jennifer Lupton
Plaintiff Trustee of the Lupton Trust
Gillian Margaret Hooper
Defendant Executor and Trustee of the Estate of Anne Mac Donald Lupton
Murray Roy Hughes
Defendant Executor and Trustee of the Estate of Anne Mac Donald Lupton
Procedural Posture
Civil Summary Judgment Application / Application Heard and Judgment Delivered
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether $13,569.46 was a loan owed by the estate to the Lupton Trust
- 2 Whether defendants have a bona fide defence that raises a real question to be tried
- 3 Whether a Disputes Tribunal claim against an individual defendant can be set off against a debt owed by the estate to the Trust
Ratio Decidendi
Evidence, including contemporaneous affidavits and the estate's Schedule of Assets and Liabilities, established the $13,569.46 was a loan from the Lupton Trust to the estate which was not gifted and remains repayable; the Disputes Tribunal claim is a personal claim against Warwick Lupton and cannot be set off against the Trust's claim; therefore defendants had no real defence and summary judgment is warranted.
Court Disposition
Summary judgment granted for plaintiffs
Orders
- Defendants to pay plaintiffs $13,569.46
- Payment deferred for 30 working days from date of judgment
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment