PERROT-HUNT v JOHNSTON [2017] NZHC 689
Summary judgment was dismissed because the defendant did not satisfy the Court that none of the causes of action could succeed (notably those arising from his conduct as a partner of Corban Revell); however, the pleadings disclosed no tenable cause of action against him in his capacity as principal of Central Park Legal Limited, so those parts were struck out.
- Citation
- [2017] NZHC 689
- Parties
- First Plaintiff: Matthew Neil Perrot-Hunt; Second Plaintiff: HUNT FT LIMITED; Second Plaintiff: Debra Cecilia Holtom; First Defendant: Edward Errol Johnston; Second Defendant: Ed Johnston & Co Trustees Limited; Third Defendant: Ronald Bruce Johnson; Third Defendant: John Kahukiwa; Third Defendant: Lawrence Ponniah trading as Corban Revell; Fourth Defendant: Ronald Bruce Johnson; Fifth Defendant: Ross Jams Farron; Fifth Defendant: James Robert Arthur Nash; Sixth Defendant: Ross James Farron
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 11 April 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Trusts and Professional Negligence / Summary Judgment and Strike Out Hearing (pre Trial)
- Outcome
- Application for summary judgment dismissed; pleadings against Ronald Bruce Johnson as principal of Central Park Legal Limited struck out; costs awarded to fourth defendant; directions for amended pleading and case management conference.
- Legal Topics
- Summary Judgment, Strike Out, Breach of Fiduciary Duty, Conspiracy by Unlawful Means, Case Management
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Matthew Neil Perrot-Hunt
First Plaintiff
HUNT FT LIMITED
Second Plaintiff
Debra Cecilia Holtom
Second Plaintiff
Edward Errol Johnston
First Defendant
Ed Johnston & Co Trustees Limited
Second Defendant
Ronald Bruce Johnson
Third Defendant
John Kahukiwa
Third Defendant
Lawrence Ponniah trading as Corban Revell
Third Defendant
Ronald Bruce Johnson
Fourth Defendant
Ross Jams Farron
Fifth Defendant
James Robert Arthur Nash
Fifth Defendant
Ross James Farron
Sixth Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Trusts and Professional Negligence / Summary Judgment and Strike Out Hearing (pre Trial)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether alleged wrongful acts occurred while defendant was principal of Central Park Legal Ltd
- 2 Whether defendant can obtain summary judgment under r12.2 when sued in multiple capacities
- 3 Whether the pleading discloses a tenable cause of action against defendant in his capacity as principal of Central Park Legal Ltd
Ratio Decidendi
Summary judgment was dismissed because the defendant did not satisfy the Court that none of the causes of action could succeed (notably those arising from his conduct as a partner of Corban Revell); however, the pleadings disclosed no tenable cause of action against him in his capacity as principal of Central Park Legal Limited, so those parts were struck out.
Court Disposition
Application for summary judgment dismissed; pleadings against Ronald Bruce Johnson as principal of Central Park Legal Limited struck out; costs awarded to fourth defendant; directions for amended pleading and case management conference.
Orders
- The application for summary judgment is dismissed.
- The pleadings against Mr Bruce Johnson as principal of Central Park Legal Limited are struck out.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment