GREGORY v THAMES COROMANDEL DISTRICT COUNCIL [2018] NZHC 699
Defendants were entitled to costs for their unarguable claim to Section 20 land and the personal claim against Mr Leach, but the plaintiffs' partial and public interest success on lesser customary interests in reclaimed land justified departing from a full costs award; self-represented plaintiffs may only recover disbursements; naming Mr Leach personally was improper and the costs associated with that personalization are apportioned at 15% against the plaintiffs, with the remainder of costs and disbursements to lie where they fall except for a joint order in favour of TCDC and Mr Leach on a 2B basis for the personalisation/Section 20 aspects, quantum to be fixed if not agreed.
- Citation
- [2018] NZHC 699
- Parties
- First Plaintiff: Colt Gregory (Authorised Executor) of Uri o Tamatepo; Second Plaintiff: Peter James Martin (Registrar) of Whakaminernga ki Hauraki; First Defendant: Thames Coromandel District Council; Second Defendant: Glenn Leach; Third Defendant: John Hook; Fourth Defendant: Minister for Land Information; Fifth Defendant: Schmitt Group
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 18 April 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Land Dispute (tangata Whenua Claims) / Costs Judgment Following Summary Judgment and Strike Out Orders
- Outcome
- Costs and disbursements otherwise lie where they fall; exception: joint order for costs and disbursements in favour of TCDC and Mr Leach on a 2B basis against the plaintiffs jointly and severally in respect of the Section 20 claim and the personalisation of Mr Leach, with 15% of costs attributable to the...
- Legal Topics
- Summary Judgment, Costs Allocation, Reclaimed Land, Customary Title, Indefeasible Title, Striking Out, Public Interest, Taonga Tuku Iho
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Colt Gregory (Authorised Executor) of Uri o Tamatepo
First Plaintiff
Peter James Martin (Registrar) of Whakaminernga ki Hauraki
Second Plaintiff
Thames Coromandel District Council
First Defendant
Glenn Leach
Second Defendant
John Hook
Third Defendant
Minister for Land Information
Fourth Defendant
Schmitt Group
Fifth Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Land Dispute (tangata Whenua Claims) / Costs Judgment Following Summary Judgment and Strike Out Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether successful parties (TCDC and Mr Leach) are entitled to costs for successful summary judgment on Section 20 land and personal claim against Mr Leach
- 2 Whether self-represented plaintiffs can recover solicitor costs or only disbursements
- 3 Appropriate apportionment of costs given partial plaintiff success on reclaimed land issues of public interest
Ratio Decidendi
Defendants were entitled to costs for their unarguable claim to Section 20 land and the personal claim against Mr Leach, but the plaintiffs' partial and public interest success on lesser customary interests in reclaimed land justified departing from a full costs award; self-represented plaintiffs may only recover disbursements; naming Mr Leach personally was improper and the costs associated with that personalization are apportioned at 15% against the plaintiffs, with the remainder of costs and disbursements to lie where they fall except for a joint order in favour of TCDC and Mr Leach on a 2B basis for the personalisation/Section 20 aspects, quantum to be fixed if not agreed.
Court Disposition
Costs and disbursements otherwise lie where they fall; exception: joint order for costs and disbursements in favour of TCDC and Mr Leach on a 2B basis against the plaintiffs jointly and severally in respect of the Section 20 claim and the personalisation of Mr Leach, with 15% of costs attributable to the...
Orders
- Costs and disbursements to lie where they fall except as below
- Joint order for costs on a 2B basis and disbursements in favour of Thames Coromandel District Council and Glenn Leach against the plaintiffs jointly and severally in respect of the Section 20 land claim and the personal claim against Mr Leach
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment