DENG v YE (Costs) [2018] NZHC 927
The court awarded costs to Ms Deng on a 2B basis for the summary judgment application and specified related steps, declined to award indemnity/increased costs because the r 14.6 threshold was not met, ordered Ms Ye personally to pay the costs of defending the summary judgment application because her failure to alert the Court to relevant information caused the wrongful appointment, declined to award costs for the stay application or for items relating solely to the substantive trial, limited recoverable disbursements to those exclusively related to the awarded steps, and refused certification for second counsel and costs on the costs memoranda.
- Citation
- [2018] NZHC 927
- Parties
- Plaintiff in 1022 and Defendant in 1005: Jie Deng; Defendant in 1022 and Plaintiff in 1005: Huifang Ye; Second Defendant in 1005: Public Trust
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 3 May 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (summary Judgment; Return of Property; Estate Administration) / Post‑judgment Costs Determination
- Outcome
- Costs awarded to Ms Deng on a 2B basis for the summary judgment application and specified related steps; no indemnity/increased costs; no costs awarded for the stay application; Ms Ye ordered to pay costs personally for defending the summary judgment application; disbursements limited to items exclusively related to...
- Legal Topics
- Summary Judgment, Stay of Proceedings, Costs and Disbursements, Indemnity/increased Costs, Personal Liability of Administrator
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jie Deng
Plaintiff in 1022 and Defendant in 1005
Huifang Ye
Defendant in 1022 and Plaintiff in 1005
Public Trust
Second Defendant in 1005
Procedural Posture
Civil (summary Judgment; Return of Property; Estate Administration) / Post‑judgment Costs Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether indemnity or increased costs should be awarded for the summary judgment and stay applications
- 2 Scope of a 2B costs award and which steps it covers
- 3 Whether costs should be payable personally by the administrator or from the estate
Ratio Decidendi
The court awarded costs to Ms Deng on a 2B basis for the summary judgment application and specified related steps, declined to award indemnity/increased costs because the r 14.6 threshold was not met, ordered Ms Ye personally to pay the costs of defending the summary judgment application because her failure to alert the Court to relevant information caused the wrongful appointment, declined to award costs for the stay application or for items relating solely to the substantive trial, limited recoverable disbursements to those exclusively related to the awarded steps, and refused certification for second counsel and costs on the costs memoranda.
Court Disposition
Costs awarded to Ms Deng on a 2B basis for the summary judgment application and specified related steps; no indemnity/increased costs; no costs awarded for the stay application; Ms Ye ordered to pay costs personally for defending the summary judgment application; disbursements limited to items exclusively related to...
Orders
- Award costs to Jie Deng on a 2B basis for the summary judgment application, written submissions on that application, preparation of the bundle and appearance at the hearing, plus specified commencement, case management and discovery steps
- Do not award costs for the application to stay the 1005 proceeding and leave costs relating to the unopposed transfer of funds in 1005 to lie where they fall
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment