SUNDE & ORS v SUNDE & ORS [2019] NZHC 3056
Summary judgment was entered because the estate established that Kevin had no defence to the claim, the pending s 103 Family Court application did not preclude enforcement of the debt or interest demands, the executor had ratified prior demands and had pursued the claim (constituting demand), and there was no utility in further adjournment given failed mediation and the need for finality.
- Citation
- [2019] NZHC 3056
- Parties
- First Plaintiff: Roy Melvin Sunde; Second Plaintiff: Marina Anne Sunde; Third Plaintiff: Anne Vera Sunde; Fourth Plaintiff: Roy Melvin Sunde as executor of the estate of Leo Zane Sunde; Defendant Trustee: Leo Zane Sunde; Defendant Trustee: Anne Vera Sunde; Defendant Trustee: Roy Melvin Sunde; Defendant Trustee (fourth Named Defendant): Kevin Paul Sunde; Defendant Trustee: Marina Anne Sunde
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 22 November 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Summary Judgment Proceeding / Judgment (no 2) Summary Judgment Entered
- Outcome
- Summary judgment entered in favour of the fourth plaintiff, Roy Melvin Sunde as executor for the estate of Leo Zane Sunde, against the defendants (trustees of the Leroy Trust)
- Legal Topics
- Summary Judgment, Enforcement of Debt Against Trust, Power of Attorney, Protection of Personal and Property Rights Act S 103, Executor Duties, Ratification of Agent's Acts
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Roy Melvin Sunde
First Plaintiff
Marina Anne Sunde
Second Plaintiff
Anne Vera Sunde
Third Plaintiff
Roy Melvin Sunde as executor of the estate of Leo Zane Sunde
Fourth Plaintiff
Leo Zane Sunde
Defendant Trustee
Anne Vera Sunde
Defendant Trustee
Roy Melvin Sunde
Defendant Trustee
Kevin Paul Sunde
Defendant Trustee (fourth Named Defendant)
Marina Anne Sunde
Defendant Trustee
Procedural Posture
Summary Judgment Proceeding / Judgment (no 2) Summary Judgment Entered
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether summary judgment should be entered for the estate against the trustees of the Leroy Trust
- 2 Whether the pending Family Court s 103 PPPRA application by Kevin prevents summary judgment
- 3 Whether a separate demand for payment by the executor was required prior to judgment
Ratio Decidendi
Summary judgment was entered because the estate established that Kevin had no defence to the claim, the pending s 103 Family Court application did not preclude enforcement of the debt or interest demands, the executor had ratified prior demands and had pursued the claim (constituting demand), and there was no utility in further adjournment given failed mediation and the need for finality.
Court Disposition
Summary judgment entered in favour of the fourth plaintiff, Roy Melvin Sunde as executor for the estate of Leo Zane Sunde, against the defendants (trustees of the Leroy Trust)
Orders
- Order substituting Roy Melvin Sunde as executor of the estate of Leo Zane Sunde as fourth plaintiff pursuant to rr 4.50 and 4.52 High Court Rules 2016
- Summary judgment awarded to the fourth plaintiff against the defendants in the sum of $3,021,012
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment