R v TIPENE [2016] NZHC 2024
Offending against BE attracts a starting point at upper Band 2 of 10 years due to premeditation, home invasion, threats, victim vulnerability, harm and scale; uplift of 4 years for offending against HE yields a global starting point of 14 years; a 20% reduction for guilty pleas produces a final determinate sentence of 11 years' imprisonment; concurrent sentences imposed on other charges; no minimum period of imprisonment imposed as default minimum is sufficient.
- Citation
- [2016] NZHC 2024
- Parties
- Crown: The Queen; Defendant: Te Anga Wiremu Tipene
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 26 August 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal (high Court) Sexual and Related Offences / Sentencing Hearing (26 August 2016)
- Outcome
- Defendant convicted and sentenced to 11 years' imprisonment; other concurrent terms as sentenced; no minimum period of imprisonment imposed; publication suppression for victims ordered.
- Legal Topics
- Rape, Unlawful Sexual Connection, Oral Sexual Assault, Burglary, Threats to Kill, Indecent Assault, Guilty Plea Discount, Minimum Period of Imprisonment, Victim Vulnerability
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Queen
Crown
Te Anga Wiremu Tipene
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal (high Court) Sexual and Related Offences / Sentencing Hearing (26 August 2016)
Legal Issues
- 1 Appropriate starting point and uplift for multiple sexual violations committed during a home invasion
- 2 Identification and weight of aggravating and mitigating factors (premeditation, home invasion, threats, victim vulnerability, harm, scale)
- 3 Appropriate discount for guilty pleas and remorse
Ratio Decidendi
Offending against BE attracts a starting point at upper Band 2 of 10 years due to premeditation, home invasion, threats, victim vulnerability, harm and scale; uplift of 4 years for offending against HE yields a global starting point of 14 years; a 20% reduction for guilty pleas produces a final determinate sentence of 11 years' imprisonment; concurrent sentences imposed on other charges; no minimum period of imprisonment imposed as default minimum is sufficient.
Court Disposition
Defendant convicted and sentenced to 11 years' imprisonment; other concurrent terms as sentenced; no minimum period of imprisonment imposed; publication suppression for victims ordered.
Orders
- Sentence of 11 years' imprisonment imposed for charges 4, 5 and 6 (sexual violation by rape and sexual violation by unlawful sexual connection)
- Sentence of 5 years' imprisonment imposed on charge 1 (burglary)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment