THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS v PARSONS [2017] NZHC 18

THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS v PARSONS [2017] NZHC 18

Because the respondent consented and the circumstances justified continued supervision pending a substantive hearing, the court made an interim supervision order with intensive monitoring on the standard and special conditions attached to the application, effective 26 January 2017 and continuing until determination...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] NZHC 18
Parties
Applicant: The Chief Executive of the Department of Corrections; Respondent: Pierre John Parsons
Court
High Court
Jurisdiction
New Zealand
Judgment Date
18 January 2017
Procedural Posture
Criminal Application for Extended Supervision Order / Interim Supervision Order Granted; Substantive Hearing Scheduled; First Call Vacated
Outcome
Interim supervision order with intensive monitoring granted and ordered to continue until determination of the substantive applications; first call vacated; substantive hearing scheduled.
Legal Topics
Extended Supervision Order, Interim Supervision Order, Intensive Monitoring, Supervision Conditions
Criminal Law Corrections Public Law Extended Supervision Order Interim Supervision Order Intensive Monitoring Supervision Conditions

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

The Chief Executive of the Department of Corrections

Applicant

Pierre John Parsons

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Application for Extended Supervision Order / Interim Supervision Order Granted; Substantive Hearing Scheduled; First Call Vacated

  1. 1 Whether an interim supervision order with intensive monitoring should remain in force pending a substantive hearing
  2. 2 Whether it is appropriate to vacate or reschedule the first call hearing in light of consent to the interim order

Ratio Decidendi

Because the respondent consented and the circumstances justified continued supervision pending a substantive hearing, the court made an interim supervision order with intensive monitoring on the standard and special conditions attached to the application, effective 26 January 2017 and continuing until determination of the substantive applications; the first call was vacated and the substantive hearing was scheduled for 26 April 2017 at 2.15 pm.

Court Disposition

Interim supervision order with intensive monitoring granted and ordered to continue until determination of the substantive applications; first call vacated; substantive hearing scheduled.

Orders

  • Interim supervision order with intensive monitoring on the standard conditions and the special conditions attached to the application dated 22 December 2016 to come into force on 26 January 2017 and continue until the substantive applications are determined.
  • Substantive hearing listed for 26 April 2017 at 2.15 pm.