TOURISM HOLDINGS LIMITED v A LABOUR INSPECTOR OF THE MINISTRY OF BUSINESS, INNOVATION AND EMPLOYMENT [2021] NZSC 39

TOURISM HOLDINGS LIMITED v A LABOUR INSPECTOR OF THE MINISTRY OF BUSINESS, INNOVATION AND EMPLOYMENT [2021] NZSC 39

The Supreme Court granted leave to appeal and framed the approved question for determination as whether the Court of Appeal correctly answered the questions of law submitted to it.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] NZSC 39
Parties
Applicant: Tourism Holdings Limited; Respondent: A Labour Inspector of the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment
Court
Supreme Court
Jurisdiction
New Zealand
Judgment Date
6 May 2021
Procedural Posture
Appeal to Supreme Court / Leave to Appeal Granted
Outcome
Leave to appeal granted; approved question for determination stated.
Legal Topics
Leave to Appeal, Questions of Law, Court of Appeal Review
Employment Law Administrative Law Civil Procedure Leave to Appeal Questions of Law Court of Appeal Review

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Tourism Holdings Limited

Applicant

A Labour Inspector of the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal to Supreme Court / Leave to Appeal Granted

  1. 1 Whether leave to appeal should be granted
  2. 2 Whether the Court of Appeal correctly answered the questions of law submitted for determination by it

Ratio Decidendi

The Supreme Court granted leave to appeal and framed the approved question for determination as whether the Court of Appeal correctly answered the questions of law submitted to it.

Court Disposition

Leave to appeal granted; approved question for determination stated.

Orders

  • Leave to appeal granted (A Labour Inspector of the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment v Tourism Holdings Ltd [2021] NZCA 1).
  • Approved question: whether the Court of Appeal correctly answered the questions of law submitted for determination by it.