NEW ZEALAND STEEL LIMITED v THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL [2013] NZHC 3524
The Iron and Steel Industry Act 1959 created a special statutory regime authorising ironsands mining without further authority and the 1966 licence conferred the contractual and statutory right to require the Crown to fell and remove trees as part of those mining operations; the Crown Minerals Act transitional...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2013] NZHC 3524
- Parties
- First Plaintiff: New Zealand Steel Limited; Second Plaintiff: Waikato North Head Mining Limited; First Defendant: The Attorney-General; Second Defendant: Waikato Regional Council
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 20 December 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Declaratory Proceedings / Judgment
- Outcome
- Declarations granted in favour of plaintiffs
- Legal Topics
- Transitional Provisions, Existing Privileges, Resource Consents, Mining Licences, Tree Felling and Land Disturbance, Crown Obligations
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
New Zealand Steel Limited
First Plaintiff
Waikato North Head Mining Limited
Second Plaintiff
The Attorney-General
First Defendant
Waikato Regional Council
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Declaratory Proceedings / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the 1966 licence and the Iron and Steel Industry Act 1959 entitled the licensee to require tree felling and associated land disturbance as part of mining operations prior to 1991
- 2 Whether the Crown Minerals Act 1991 transitional provisions preserved those rights so that resource consents under the Resource Management Act 1991 are not required for tree felling and incidental land disturbance
Ratio Decidendi
The Iron and Steel Industry Act 1959 created a special statutory regime authorising ironsands mining without further authority and the 1966 licence conferred the contractual and statutory right to require the Crown to fell and remove trees as part of those mining operations; the Crown Minerals Act transitional provisions preserved those pre-1991 statutory rights so neither the licensee nor the Crown require resource consents under the Resource Management Act 1991 for tree felling and necessary incidental land disturbance.
Court Disposition
Declarations granted in favour of plaintiffs
Orders
- Declaration that the 1966 Deed of Licence included the right of the Licensee to require felling and removal of trees and necessary incidental works, including soil disturbance and vegetation clearance, on notice by the Licensor to permit mining operations to proceed
- Declaration that the Deed of Licence is an 'existing privilege' within the meaning of clause 12 of Schedule 1 to the Crown Minerals Act 1991
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment