MCLEAN v NEW ZEALAND POLICE [2023] NZHC 3724

MCLEAN v NEW ZEALAND POLICE [2023] NZHC 3724

Because the sentencing Judge failed to account for 160 days remanded in custody, the four months' home detention was manifestly excessive and effectively already served; the home detention order was therefore quashed and substituted with specified supervision sentences, while other penalties remained.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] NZHC 3724
Parties
Appellant: Tre McLean; Respondent: New Zealand Police
Court
High Court
Jurisdiction
New Zealand
Judgment Date
15 December 2023
Procedural Posture
Sentencing Appeal / High Court Hearing on Appeal From District Court Sentence
Outcome
Appeal allowed in part; home detention sentence quashed and substituted with supervision sentences; other sentences (community work, fines, disqualifications) upheld
Legal Topics
Home Detention, Time Served, Remand Credit, Conversion of Imprisonment to Home Detention, Supervision Conditions
Criminal Law Sentencing Firearms Law Bail and Remand Home Detention Time Served Remand Credit Conversion of Imprisonment to Home Detention +1 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 11 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Tre McLean

Appellant

New Zealand Police

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Sentencing Appeal / High Court Hearing on Appeal From District Court Sentence

  1. 1 Whether time remanded in custody must be credited against a sentence of home detention and how that credit should be applied
  2. 2 Whether the home detention sentence was manifestly excessive given time already served on remand
  3. 3 What sentence should properly replace the quashed home detention order

Ratio Decidendi

Because the sentencing Judge failed to account for 160 days remanded in custody, the four months' home detention was manifestly excessive and effectively already served; the home detention order was therefore quashed and substituted with specified supervision sentences, while other penalties remained.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed in part; home detention sentence quashed and substituted with supervision sentences; other sentences (community work, fines, disqualifications) upheld

Orders

  • Home detention of four months quashed and replaced by: six months' supervision for unlawful possession of a firearm with conditions: (i) not to possess, use or consume alcohol or controlled drugs or any psychoactive substances unless prescribed by a doctor; and (ii) to attend an alcohol and drug assessment and to...
  • Three months' supervision, to run cumulatively, for careless driving causing injury