2307843c-335e-48df-bd5b-6658707fdcd5.pdf
Frank McAtamney, being the person vested by clause 9 with the statutory power of appointment, validly exercised that power in appointing John Duncan McFarlane on 27 March 2000 and Anne-Marie Allen on 30 December 2009; Margaret's concurrent signature was ineffective and did not invalidate Frank's exercise, therefore declaratory orders confirming validity were appropriate.
- Citation
- openlaw-2d1208d6_dcca_4fa1_90d7_607b4533f44c.pdf
- Parties
- First Plaintiff: FRANCIS STEVENS McATAMNEY; Second Plaintiff: JOHN DUNCAN McFARLANE; Third Plaintiff: ANNE-MARIE ALLEN; First Defendant: ANNE-MARIE ALLEN; Second Defendant: JONATHAN CHRISTOPHER ALLEN; Third Defendant: NATALIE ANNE MARGARET ALLEN; Fourth Defendant: STEPHEN FRANCIS McATAMNEY; Fifth Defendant: DANIEL FRANCIS McATAMNEY; Sixth Defendant: ANTHONY JOSHUA McATAMNEY; Seventh Defendant: MATTHEW STEPHEN McATAMNEY; Eighth Defendant: PAULINE MARGARET McATAMNEY; Ninth Defendant: ELIZABTH MARY McATAMNEY; Tenth Defendant: REBECCA MARGARET McATAMNEY; Eleventh Defendant: SAMUEL ROBERT JOHNSON; Twelfth Defendant: BRIDGET ELIZABETH JOHNSON; Thirteenth Defendant: CAROLYN TERESA AGNES McATAMNEY-RASCH; Fourteenth Defendant: SAVANNAH JESSICA McATAMNEY-RASCH; Fifteenth Defendant: ZETTLIN OLLIE FRANCIS McATAMNEY-RASCH
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 22 July 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Declaratory Judgment / Final Judgment (declaration Delivered)
- Outcome
- Declarations granted that the two appointments were valid and costs awarded against the trust
- Legal Topics
- Validity of Appointment of Trustees, Construction of Trust Deed, Statutory Power of Appointment, Declaratory Judgments Act 1908
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
FRANCIS STEVENS McATAMNEY
First Plaintiff
JOHN DUNCAN McFARLANE
Second Plaintiff
ANNE-MARIE ALLEN
Third Plaintiff
ANNE-MARIE ALLEN
First Defendant
JONATHAN CHRISTOPHER ALLEN
Second Defendant
NATALIE ANNE MARGARET ALLEN
Third Defendant
STEPHEN FRANCIS McATAMNEY
Fourth Defendant
DANIEL FRANCIS McATAMNEY
Fifth Defendant
ANTHONY JOSHUA McATAMNEY
Sixth Defendant
MATTHEW STEPHEN McATAMNEY
Seventh Defendant
PAULINE MARGARET McATAMNEY
Eighth Defendant
ELIZABTH MARY McATAMNEY
Ninth Defendant
REBECCA MARGARET McATAMNEY
Tenth Defendant
SAMUEL ROBERT JOHNSON
Eleventh Defendant
BRIDGET ELIZABETH JOHNSON
Twelfth Defendant
CAROLYN TERESA AGNES McATAMNEY-RASCH
Thirteenth Defendant
SAVANNAH JESSICA McATAMNEY-RASCH
Fourteenth Defendant
ZETTLIN OLLIE FRANCIS McATAMNEY-RASCH
Fifteenth Defendant
Procedural Posture
Declaratory Judgment / Final Judgment (declaration Delivered)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appointments dated 27 March 2000 and 30 December 2009 were valid where clause 9 vested the statutory power of appointment solely in Frank McAtamney
- 2 Whether Margaret McAtamney's purported co-exercise of the power invalidated the appointments
- 3 Whether the Court should exercise its discretion to grant declaratory relief under the Declaratory Judgments Act 1908
Ratio Decidendi
Frank McAtamney, being the person vested by clause 9 with the statutory power of appointment, validly exercised that power in appointing John Duncan McFarlane on 27 March 2000 and Anne-Marie Allen on 30 December 2009; Margaret's concurrent signature was ineffective and did not invalidate Frank's exercise, therefore declaratory orders confirming validity were appropriate.
Court Disposition
Declarations granted that the two appointments were valid and costs awarded against the trust
Orders
- John Duncan McFarlane of Timaru, chartered accountant, was on 27 March 2000 validly appointed a trustee of the Waimarie Second Family Trust established by deed on 17 September 1997.
- Anne-Marie Allen of Ashburton, farmer, was on 30 December 2009 validly appointed a trustee of the Waimarie Second Family Trust established by deed on 17 September 1997.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment