RE CANTERBURY BRANCH NEW ZEALAND FEDERATION OF UNIVERSITY WOMEN TRUST [2015] NZHC 950
The Court approved the scheme because the proposed amendments and limits on trustee amendment powers facilitate the administration and carrying out of the charitable trust, do not affect the integrity or charitable purpose of the original objects, and comply with the requirements of s56 (and the advertising requirements of s36). The Attorney‑General's report supported these findings.
- Citation
- [2015] NZHC 950
- Parties
- Applicant/trustee: Judith Diane Brooks; Applicant/trustee: Bernadette Frances Devonport; Applicant/trustee: Deborah Mary Errington; Applicant/trustee: Ngaio Wendy Francis; Applicant/trustee: Ellen Lorraine McCrae; Applicant/trustee: Jean Ellen Sharfe; Applicant/trustee: Hilary Jane Stubbs
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 7 May 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Charitable Trusts Act Application / Approval of Scheme to Alter Mode of Administration (decision)
- Outcome
- Scheme approved under s56 of the Charitable Trusts Act 1957
- Legal Topics
- Variation of Trust Deed, Mode of Administration, Powers of Trustees, Scheme Approval, Attorney‑general Report, Statutory Compliance
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Judith Diane Brooks
Applicant/trustee
Bernadette Frances Devonport
Applicant/trustee
Deborah Mary Errington
Applicant/trustee
Ngaio Wendy Francis
Applicant/trustee
Ellen Lorraine McCrae
Applicant/trustee
Jean Ellen Sharfe
Applicant/trustee
Hilary Jane Stubbs
Applicant/trustee
Procedural Posture
Charitable Trusts Act Application / Approval of Scheme to Alter Mode of Administration (decision)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the proposed scheme facilitates the administration and carrying out of the charitable trust
- 2 Whether the proposed trustee power to amend the trust deed is permissible and adequately limited
- 3 Whether the proposed amendments affect the charitable objects or are contrary to law/public policy
Ratio Decidendi
The Court approved the scheme because the proposed amendments and limits on trustee amendment powers facilitate the administration and carrying out of the charitable trust, do not affect the integrity or charitable purpose of the original objects, and comply with the requirements of s56 (and the advertising requirements of s36). The Attorney‑General's report supported these findings.
Court Disposition
Scheme approved under s56 of the Charitable Trusts Act 1957
Orders
- Order granting approval of the scheme attached to the application of 23 February 2015 marked "A"
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment