GREENWOOD, DANIELL, MCLENNAN, BEETHAM AND BAUMANN [2016] NZHC 1034
The Court found the proposed amendments to the Trust Deed were within the jurisdiction of ss 32 and 33 CTA and would facilitate administration and the charitable purposes, and therefore approved them; the Court declined to rely on s 33 to approve the related transactions but instead gave directions under s 66 Trustee Act permitting the trustees to enter into the proposed sale, lease and tenancy with Beetham Pastural Ltd and Mr Beetham and to modify those agreements as authorised by the new deed, and directed that the trustees may meet the application and Attorney-General's costs from trust assets.
- Citation
- [2016] NZHC 1034
- Parties
- Applicant/trustee: John Paul Greenwood; Applicant/trustee: Garry Edward Daniell; Applicant/trustee: Alistair David McLennan; Applicant/trustee: Ralph William Trevor Beetham; Applicant/trustee: Geraldine Ann Baumann
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 19 May 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Charitable Trusts Application Under Charitable Trusts Act 1957 and Trustee Act 1956 / Final Judgment (high Court)
- Outcome
- Application granted in part: Court approved proposed amendments to the Trust Deed under ss 32 and 33 Charitable Trusts Act 1957 and granted directions under s 66 Trustee Act 1956 permitting trustees to enter into the proposed sale, lease and tenancy and to modify those agreements; trustees may meet application and...
- Legal Topics
- Variation of Trust Deed, Scheme Approval, S 32 CTA, S 33 CTA, S 66 Trustee Act, Related Party Transactions, Leases and Sale Agreements, Public Access and Education, Conservation Funding
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John Paul Greenwood
Applicant/trustee
Garry Edward Daniell
Applicant/trustee
Alistair David McLennan
Applicant/trustee
Ralph William Trevor Beetham
Applicant/trustee
Geraldine Ann Baumann
Applicant/trustee
Procedural Posture
Charitable Trusts Application Under Charitable Trusts Act 1957 and Trustee Act 1956 / Final Judgment (high Court)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether proposed amendments to the Trust Deed are authorised under ss 32 and 33 CTA
- 2 Whether the proposed transactions (lease to related company, sale of livestock, residential tenancy) can be approved under s 33 or require directions under s 66 Trustee Act
- 3 Whether the proposed scheme remains sufficiently close to the original charitable purpose
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found the proposed amendments to the Trust Deed were within the jurisdiction of ss 32 and 33 CTA and would facilitate administration and the charitable purposes, and therefore approved them; the Court declined to rely on s 33 to approve the related transactions but instead gave directions under s 66 Trustee Act permitting the trustees to enter into the proposed sale, lease and tenancy with Beetham Pastural Ltd and Mr Beetham and to modify those agreements as authorised by the new deed, and directed that the trustees may meet the application and Attorney-General's costs from trust assets.
Court Disposition
Application granted in part: Court approved proposed amendments to the Trust Deed under ss 32 and 33 Charitable Trusts Act 1957 and granted directions under s 66 Trustee Act 1956 permitting trustees to enter into the proposed sale, lease and tenancy and to modify those agreements; trustees may meet application and...
Orders
- Proposed amendments to the Current Trust Deed approved under ss 32 and 33 Charitable Trusts Act 1957
- Direction under s 66 Trustee Act 1956 that trustees may enter into the Deed of Lease with Beetham Pastural Ltd, the agreement for sale and purchase of livestock with Beetham Pastural Ltd, and the residential tenancy agreement with Ralph Edward Beetham, and may modify those agreements in accordance with the powers in...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment