VINCENT ROSS SIEMER v DEPUTY REGISTRAR OF THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW ZEALAND [2021] NZSC 17
The application to recall the recall judgment disclosed no proper basis under the established test for recalling judgments (as set out in Craig v Williams) and must therefore be dismissed.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2021] NZSC 17
- Parties
- Applicant: Vincent Ross Siemer; Respondent: Deputy Registrar of the Supreme Court of New Zealand
- Court
- Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 4 March 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Recall of Judgment / Post Judgment Recall Application
- Outcome
- Application for recall dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Recall of Judgment, Slip and Omission Rule, Procedural Directions, Refusal to Recall
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Vincent Ross Siemer
Applicant
Deputy Registrar of the Supreme Court of New Zealand
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Recall of Judgment / Post Judgment Recall Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the recall judgment should itself be recalled
- 2 Whether the applicant disclosed a proper basis under the settled test for recall
- 3 Whether relief could be granted under the slip and omission rule
Ratio Decidendi
The application to recall the recall judgment disclosed no proper basis under the established test for recalling judgments (as set out in Craig v Williams) and must therefore be dismissed.
Court Disposition
Application for recall dismissed.
Orders
- Application for recall dismissed
- Registrar is directed to reject any further applications or documents relating to the original judgment, the recall judgment or this judgment
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
VINCENT ROSS SIEMER v DEPUTY REGISTRAR OF THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW ZEALAND[2021] NZSC 17 [4 March 2021]IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW ZEALANDI TE KŌTI MANA NUISC 101/2020[2021] NZSC 17BETWEEN VINCENT ROSS SIEMERApplicantAND DEPUTY REGISTRAR OF THESUPREME COURT OF NEW ZEALANDRespondentCourt: Glazebrook, O'Regan and Ellen France JJCounsel: Applicant in personJudgment: 4 March 2021JUDGMENT OF THE COURTThe application for recall of this Court's recall judgment of 11 February 2021(Siemer v Deputy Registrar of the Supreme Court of New Zealand[2021] NZSC 3) is dismissed.____________________________________________________________________REASONS[1] The applicant applied for the recall of this Court's judgment of 27 November2020 (the original judgment), in which his application for review of the decision ofthe Deputy Registrar was dismissed and his application for directions was alsodismissed.1[2] The application for recall was dismissed in a judgment issued on 11 February2021 (the recall judgment).21 Siemer v Deputy Registrar of the Supreme Court of New Zealand [2020] NZSC 135.2 Siemer v Deputy Registrar of the Supreme Court of New Zealand [2021] NZSC 3.[3] The applicant has now filed a document headed "Application for Recall ofJudgment or Clarification Under the Slip and Ommission [sic] Rule" in which he seeksthe recall of the recall judgment.[4] The application discloses no proper basis for recall of the recall judgment,applying the well-known test recently summarised by this Court in Craig v Williams.3[5] The application for recall of the recall judgment is therefore dismissed.[6] We direct the Registrar to reject any further applications or other documentsrelating to the original judgment, the recall judgment or this judgment.3 Craig v Williams [2019] NZSC 60 at [10].