MCCULLAGH v ROBT JONES HOLDINGS LIMITED [2017] NZHC 2182
The Court held on the balance of probabilities that: (1) payments by Columbus Jan–May 2010 were a redirection of licence fees owed to NCI under a legitimate Nov09 licence and were made with NCI's knowledge/consent; (2) payments by MSH2 Sep–Nov 2010 were effectively loans to NCI (MSH2 a wholly owned subsidiary acting for NCI) and made with NCI's knowledge; (3) NCI was unable to pay its due debts at the relevant times; (4) the payments therefore constituted insolvent transactions by NCI within s292 and were voidable; accordingly the payments totalling $751,941.52 were set aside and RJH ordered to repay that sum with interest, but no exclusion order against RJH was made.
- Citation
- [2017] NZHC 2182
- Parties
- Applicant (liquidator): Anthony John McCullagh; Applicant (liquidator): Stephen Mark Lawrence; Respondent (creditor): Robt. Jones Holdings Limited
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 8 September 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Application Under Companies Act 1993 to Set Aside Voidable Transactions (s292) / High Court Judgment on Originating Application Under S294 to Set Aside Transactions
- Outcome
- Originating application under s294 granted in part: payments set aside as voidable transactions; RJH ordered to repay $751,941.52 to Northern Crest Investments Ltd and to pay interest at 5% p.a. from 2 June 2011; order to exclude RJH from participation in liquidation refused; costs reserved.
- Legal Topics
- Voidable Transactions, Insolvent Transactions, Third Party Payments, Licence Agreements, Liquidation, Ownership of Intellectual Property, Remedies Under S295
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Anthony John McCullagh
Applicant (liquidator)
Stephen Mark Lawrence
Applicant (liquidator)
Robt. Jones Holdings Limited
Respondent (creditor)
Procedural Posture
Application Under Companies Act 1993 to Set Aside Voidable Transactions (s292) / High Court Judgment on Originating Application Under S294 to Set Aside Transactions
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether payments made to RJH by third parties (Columbus and MSH2) were transactions 'by' Northern Crest Investments Ltd for the purposes of s292
- 2 Whether those transactions were insolvent transactions (company unable to pay due debts and creditor received more than in liquidation)
- 3 Whether transactions occurred within the specified/restricted periods
Ratio Decidendi
The Court held on the balance of probabilities that: (1) payments by Columbus Jan–May 2010 were a redirection of licence fees owed to NCI under a legitimate Nov09 licence and were made with NCI's knowledge/consent; (2) payments by MSH2 Sep–Nov 2010 were effectively loans to NCI (MSH2 a wholly owned subsidiary acting for NCI) and made with NCI's knowledge; (3) NCI was unable to pay its due debts at the relevant times; (4) the payments therefore constituted insolvent transactions by NCI within s292 and were voidable; accordingly the payments totalling $751,941.52 were set aside and RJH ordered to repay that sum with interest, but no exclusion order against RJH was made.
Court Disposition
Originating application under s294 granted in part: payments set aside as voidable transactions; RJH ordered to repay $751,941.52 to Northern Crest Investments Ltd and to pay interest at 5% p.a. from 2 June 2011; order to exclude RJH from participation in liquidation refused; costs reserved.
Orders
- Set aside payments received by Robt. Jones Holdings Ltd from Columbus Property Marketing Pty Ltd and MSH No.2 Ltd between 22 January 2010 and 5 November 2010 as voidable transactions of Northern Crest Investments Ltd under s292
- Robt. Jones Holdings Ltd ordered to pay Northern Crest Investments Ltd $751,941.52 (being the value of the voidable transactions)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment