SHEAT V BOULTON HC CHCH CIV-2011-409-002435

SHEAT V BOULTON HC CHCH CIV-2011-409-002435

The Court granted a freezing order because the plaintiffs disclosed a good arguable case on the summary judgment application, assets in New Zealand were identified, and there was sufficient evidence of dissipation; the Court limited the freezing order to permit sale of specified farm equipment with court approval and required further disclosure by the defendant by 24 February 2012.

Citation
openlaw-2df53292_6e27_4576_8537_d36c7260417d.pdf
Parties
Plaintiff: Warren Thomas Sheat; Plaintiff: Lynley May Sheat; Defendant: John Robert Boulton
Court
High Court
Jurisdiction
New Zealand
Judgment Date
15 February 2012
Procedural Posture
Civil Debt/contract / Interlocutory Summary Judgment Pending; Interim Freezing Order Granted
Outcome
Interim freezing order granted; summary judgment application to proceed; further disclosure ordered; other interim directions made.
Legal Topics
Summary Judgment, Freezing Order, Asset Disclosure, Refund of Deposit
Contract Civil Procedure Equity Property Injunctions Summary Judgment Freezing Order Asset Disclosure +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Warren Thomas Sheat

Plaintiff

Lynley May Sheat

Plaintiff

John Robert Boulton

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Debt/contract / Interlocutory Summary Judgment Pending; Interim Freezing Order Granted

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the $80,922 payment was a refundable deposit or part payment of a purchase price
  2. 2 Whether the plaintiffs are entitled to summary judgment for return of the payment
  3. 3 Whether a freezing order is justified given risk of dissipation

Ratio Decidendi

The Court granted a freezing order because the plaintiffs disclosed a good arguable case on the summary judgment application, assets in New Zealand were identified, and there was sufficient evidence of dissipation; the Court limited the freezing order to permit sale of specified farm equipment with court approval and required further disclosure by the defendant by 24 February 2012.

Court Disposition

Interim freezing order granted; summary judgment application to proceed; further disclosure ordered; other interim directions made.

Orders

  • Freezing order: until further order none of the respondent's assets are to be removed from New Zealand or otherwise disposed of or diminished in value
  • Sale of the John Deere tractor, home-built trailer or trailing implements permitted only with prior court approval and proceeds to be paid into a court-approved trust account